Narolewski Robert
Z Katedry i Kliniki Neurochirurgii i Neurochirurgii Dzieciecej Pomorskiej Akademii Medycznej w Szczecinie, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin.
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2003;49:205-29.
The central skull base region and the cavernous sinus in particular have traditionally been thought inaccessible to surgical manipulations. Despite significant progress in anatomy, physiology, pathology, imaging and surgical techniques, it is still challenging to explore this part of the skull. The main risk is injury to the internal carotid artery running through the area surrounded by bony structures e.g.: anterior, middle and posterior clinoid processes, optic strut, and petrous bone (Fig. 1, 2). Access to this area requires removal of bony structures but at the same time represents the greatest surgical risk. This microsurgical anatomic study was performed to give surgeons more details on these structures and their relation to the internal carotid artery and venous neighborhood, thus making the operative procedure safer.
40 central skull base area specimens were harvested from 20 fresh human cadavers during regular anatomopathologic autopsy. Almost immediately after excision, arterial and venous systems were cannulated and injected with colored acrylic. Microsurgical dissections were performed using a surgical microscope, along with morphometric measurements and photographic documentation of anatomical variants of structures studied.
The anterior clinoid process is a structure of complex architecture. In most cases (70%), at least one bony spicula arises from the tip of anterior clinoid and not infrequently passes in a fold of the dura directly under the internal carotid. Bony bridges were observed joining spiculae with similar protrusions of the middle and/or posterior clinoid thought to be especially dangerous during anterior clinoidectomy (Tab. 2, Fig. 2). This observation is in agreement with the literature. 60% of anterior clinoids were pierced by narrow venous canals arising from the anterior cavernous sinus and running through the clinoid space (Fig. 12). They are considered a source of bleeding usually encountered at the very end of anterior clinoid removal. The optic strut seems to be a structure of stable and relatively simple architecture. In 20% of specimens, optic struts were pierced by narrow venous canals arising from the anterior cavernous sinus and running through the clinoid space. The anterior clinoid process and the optic strut happen to be pneumatized. In this case, the pneumatized area is covered with a mucous membrane and opens to the sphenoid sinus or posterior ethmoidal cells (Tab. 2). It was quite surprising that the carotid canal roof was incompletely closed in all samples, although the length of opening was highly variable (Tab. 12, Fig. 1). A relatively thick connective tissue layer covered the opening, usually occupying the area under the Gasserian ganglion i.e. the most medial part of the canal. The greater superficial petrosal nerve was a good landmark for identification of position of the carotid canal in the petrous bone. The canal ran almost directly under the nerve. The hiatus of greater superficial petrosal nerve poorly demarks the area of bone removal lateral to the posterior loop of the internal carotid (Tab. 12). Numerous morphometric measurements of anterior clinoid, optic strut, carotid canal and their anatomical variants give an even greater insight into the area (Tab. 3-13, Fig. 3-11). It is obvious that preoperative CT scanning should be done using thinnest slicing available taking into consideration the scale of measurements presented in this paper.
More details were revealed concerning an area already explored by many researchers. New observations are presented on venous canals passing through the clinoid space. A new insight has been obtained into the area around the roof of the internal carotid canal. The present rich morphometric and photographic documentation should be helpful when dealing with vascular, neoplastic or traumatic lesions of the central skull base. It can also be useful for preoperative planning or training at a neuroanatomy lab.
传统上认为中颅底区域,尤其是海绵窦,手术难以触及。尽管在解剖学、生理学、病理学、影像学和手术技术方面取得了显著进展,但探索颅骨的这一部分仍然具有挑战性。主要风险是损伤穿过由骨结构包围区域的颈内动脉,例如:前床突、中床突和后床突、视神经管、岩骨(图1、2)。进入该区域需要去除骨结构,但同时也代表了最大的手术风险。进行这项显微外科解剖学研究是为了让外科医生更详细地了解这些结构及其与颈内动脉和静脉邻域的关系,从而使手术过程更安全。
在常规解剖病理学尸检期间,从20具新鲜人类尸体上获取40个中颅底区域标本。切除后几乎立即对动脉和静脉系统进行插管并注入彩色丙烯酸。使用手术显微镜进行显微外科解剖,同时对所研究结构的解剖变异进行形态测量和摄影记录。
前床突是一个结构复杂的结构。在大多数情况下(70%),至少有一个骨小梁从前床突尖端发出,并且经常穿过颈内动脉正下方的硬脑膜褶皱。观察到骨桥将骨小梁与中床突和/或后床突的类似突起相连,在前床突切除术期间被认为特别危险(表2,图2)。这一观察结果与文献一致。60%的前床突被起源于海绵窦前部并穿过床突间隙的狭窄静脉管穿透(图12)。它们被认为是在前床突切除接近尾声时通常遇到的出血来源。视神经管似乎是一个结构稳定且相对简单的结构。在20%的标本中,视神经管被起源于海绵窦前部并穿过床突间隙的狭窄静脉管穿透。前床突和视神经管碰巧有气化。在这种情况下,气化区域覆盖有粘膜并通向蝶窦或后筛窦(表2)。令人惊讶的是,所有样本中的颈动脉管顶均未完全闭合,尽管开口长度差异很大(表12,图1)。一层相对较厚的结缔组织层覆盖开口,通常占据半月神经节下方的区域,即管的最内侧部分。岩浅大神经是识别岩骨中颈动脉管位置的良好标志。该管几乎直接在神经下方运行。岩浅大神经裂孔对颈内动脉后环外侧的骨切除区域界定不佳(表12)。对前床突,视神经管,颈动脉管及其解剖变异进行的大量形态测量,能更深入地了解该区域(表3 - 13,图3 - 11)。很明显,术前CT扫描应使用最薄的切片进行,同时考虑到本文中给出的测量尺度。
关于一个已经被许多研究人员探索过的区域,揭示了更多细节。提出了关于穿过床突间隙的静脉管的新观察结果。对颈内动脉管顶周围区域有了新的认识。目前丰富的形态测量和摄影记录在处理中颅底的血管、肿瘤或创伤性病变时应会有所帮助。它也可用于术前规划或神经解剖实验室的培训。