Wilkes Jason M, DiPalma Jack A
Division of Gastroenterology, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL 36693, USA.
South Med J. 2004 Oct;97(10):939-41. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000129929.28792.77.
To compare ankle and brachial blood pressure monitoring before and during colonoscopy using automated noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitors.
Forty-five consecutive patients who presented for outpatient colonoscopy had both ankle and brachial blood pressure monitoring with automated NIBP using an appropriately sized cuff for arm or leg size. Three baseline measurements were obtained, and then measurements were taken at 5-minute intervals during conscious sedation, with brachial blood pressure being the standard.
The average of all of the ankle blood pressures was significantly higher for all systolic and mean arterial blood pressure readings. Diastolic blood pressure readings were higher at baseline, but not significantly different during the procedure.
Ankle systolic and mean arterial blood pressures using automated NIBP monitoring for conscious sedation are significantly higher than brachial blood pressures. Ankle NIBP monitoring should only be used if brachial NIBP monitoring is not feasible, taking into consideration that ankle NIBP pressures are generally higher than brachial.
使用自动无创血压(NIBP)监测仪比较结肠镜检查前及检查过程中踝部和肱部血压。
45例连续接受门诊结肠镜检查的患者使用适合手臂或腿部尺寸的袖带,通过自动NIBP监测仪进行踝部和肱部血压监测。获取3次基线测量值,然后在清醒镇静期间每隔5分钟进行测量,以肱部血压作为标准。
所有收缩压和平均动脉血压读数中,踝部血压的平均值均显著更高。舒张压读数在基线时较高,但在检查过程中无显著差异。
使用自动NIBP监测仪进行清醒镇静时,踝部收缩压和平均动脉血压显著高于肱部血压。考虑到踝部NIBP压力通常高于肱部,仅在肱部NIBP监测不可行时才应使用踝部NIBP监测。