Cattano D, Panicucci E, Paolicchi A, Forfori F, Giunta F, Hagberg C
*Department of Surgery, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Division, Spedali Riuniti S. Chiara, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; †Department of Human and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; and ‡Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Anesth Analg. 2004 Dec;99(6):1774-1779. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136772.38754.01.
Over the last decade, there has been a heightened awareness and an increase in the amount of literature being published on recognition and prediction of the difficult airway. During the preoperative evaluation of the airway, a thorough history and physical specifically related to the airway should be performed. Various measurements of anatomic features and noninvasive clinical tests can be performed to enhance this assessment. In this study we correlated the Mallampati modified score and several other indexes with the laryngoscopic view to identify anatomical and clinical risk factors related to the difficult airway. We prospectively collected data on 1956 consecutive patients scheduled to receive general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation for elective surgery. The Mallampati classification versus the Cormack-Lehane (C-L) linear correlation index was 0.904. A Mallampati Class 3 correlated with a C-L Grade 2 (0.94), whereas a Mallampati Class 4 correlated with a C-L Grade 3 (0.85) and a C-L Grade 4 (0.80). Operator evaluation, performed by a simplified tracheal intubation difficulty scale, showed a linear correlation of 0.96 compared with the C-L groups. Although there is a correlation between oropharyngeal volume and difficult intubation, the Mallampati score by itself is insufficient for predicting difficult endotracheal intubation.
在过去十年中,人们对困难气道的识别和预测的认识有所提高,相关文献的发表数量也有所增加。在气道的术前评估中,应进行全面的病史询问和与气道具体相关的体格检查。可以进行各种解剖特征测量和非侵入性临床检查以加强这种评估。在本研究中,我们将Mallampati改良评分和其他几个指标与喉镜视野相关联,以确定与困难气道相关的解剖学和临床危险因素。我们前瞻性地收集了1956例连续接受择期手术且需要气管插管全身麻醉的患者的数据。Mallampati分级与Cormack-Lehane(C-L)线性相关指数为0.904。Mallampati 3级与C-L 2级相关(0.94),而Mallampati 4级与C-L 3级(0.85)和C-L 4级(0.80)相关。由简化气管插管困难量表进行的术者评估显示,与C-L组相比,线性相关性为0.96。虽然口咽容积与插管困难之间存在相关性,但单独的Mallampati评分不足以预测困难气管插管。