Mitchell Timothy B, Dyer Kyle R, Newcombe David, Salter Amy, Somogyi Andrew A, Bochner Felix, White Jason M
Department of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Dec;58(6):609-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02221.x.
To investigate the possibility that (S)-methadone influences therapeutic and adverse responses to rac-methadone maintenance treatment, by examining how subjective and physiological responses among rac-methadone maintenance patients vary in relation to relative exposure to (S)- vs. (R)-methadone.
Mood states (Profile of Mood States), opioid withdrawal (Methadone Symptoms Checklist), physiological responses (pupil diameter, heart rate, respiration rate, blood pressure), and plasma concentrations (CP) of (R)- and (S)-methadone were measured concurrently 11-12 times over a 24-h interdosing interval in 55 methadone maintenance patients. Average steady-state plasma concentrations (C(av)) and pharmacodynamic responses were calculated using area under the curve (AUC). Linear regression was used to determine whether variability in pharmacodynamic responses was accounted for by (S)-methadone C(av) controlling for (R)-methadone C(av) and rac-methadone dose. Ratios of (S)-:(R)-methadone using AUC(CP) and trough values were correlated with pharmacodynamic responses for all subjects and separately for those with daily rac-methadone doses > or = 100 mg.
(S)-methadone C(av) accounted for significant variability in pharmacodynamic responses beyond that accounted for by (R)-methadone C(av) and rac-methadone dose, showing positive associations (partial r) with the intensity of negative mood states such as Tension (0.28), Fatigue (0.31), Confusion (0.32), and opioid withdrawal scores (0.30); an opposite pattern of relationships was evident for (R)-methadone. The plasma (S)-:(R)-methadone AUC(CP) ratio (mean +/- SD 1.05 +/- 0.21, range 0.65-1.51) was not significantly related to pharmacodynamic responses for the subjects as a whole but showed significant positive associations (r) with the intensity of negative mood states such as Total Mood Disturbance (0.61), Tension (0.69), Fatigue (0.65), Confusion (0.64), Depression (0.49) and heart rate (0.59) for the > or = 100-mg dose range.
These findings agree with previous evidence that (S)-methadone is associated with a significant and potentially adverse profile of responses distinct from that of (R)-methadone. Individual variability in relative (S)- vs. (R)-methadone exposure may be associated with variability in response to rac-methadone maintenance treatment.
通过研究消旋美沙酮维持治疗患者中主观和生理反应如何因(S)-美沙酮与(R)-美沙酮的相对暴露量而变化,探讨(S)-美沙酮对消旋美沙酮维持治疗的疗效和不良反应的影响。
在55名美沙酮维持治疗患者的24小时给药间隔内,同时测量11 - 12次情绪状态(情绪状态剖面图)、阿片戒断症状(美沙酮症状清单)、生理反应(瞳孔直径、心率、呼吸频率、血压)以及(R)-和(S)-美沙酮的血浆浓度(CP)。使用曲线下面积(AUC)计算平均稳态血浆浓度(C(av))和药效学反应。采用线性回归确定在控制(R)-美沙酮C(av)和消旋美沙酮剂量的情况下,(S)-美沙酮C(av)是否能解释药效学反应的变异性。使用AUC(CP)和谷值计算(S)-:(R)-美沙酮的比率,并将其与所有受试者以及每日消旋美沙酮剂量≥100 mg的受试者的药效学反应进行相关性分析。
(S)-美沙酮C(av)在解释药效学反应变异性方面,超出了(R)-美沙酮C(av)和消旋美沙酮剂量所能解释的范围,显示出与紧张(0.28)、疲劳(0.31)、困惑(0.32)等负面情绪状态的强度以及阿片戒断评分(0.30)呈正相关(偏相关系数r);(R)-美沙酮则呈现相反的关系模式。血浆(S)-:(R)-美沙酮AUC(CP)比率(均值±标准差 1.05±0.21,范围0.65 - 1.51)在整体受试者中与药效学反应无显著相关性,但在每日消旋美沙酮剂量≥100 mg的范围内,与总情绪紊乱(0.61)、紧张(0.69)、疲劳(0.65)、困惑(0.64)、抑郁(0.49)和心率(0.59)等负面情绪状态的强度呈显著正相关(相关系数r)。
这些发现与之前的证据一致,即(S)-美沙酮与一种明显且可能不良的反应特征相关,这与(R)-美沙酮不同。(S)-与(R)-美沙酮相对暴露量的个体差异可能与消旋美沙酮维持治疗的反应差异有关。