Koch K, Oellig F, Oberholzer K, Bender P, Kunz P, Mildenberger P, Hake U, Kreitner K-F, Thelen M
Department of Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2005 Feb;15(2):312-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2543-6. Epub 2004 Nov 24.
The purpose of this study was to determine right ventricular (RV) function from 16-detector-row CT by using two different software tools in comparison with MRI. Nineteen patients underwent cardiac CT. (1) With semiautomated contour detection software end-diastolic and end-systolic RV volumes were determined from short-axis CT reformations (MPR) created at every 10% of the RR-interval. (2) End-systolic and end-diastolic axial images were transformed to 3D to determine the volumes by using a threshold-supported reconstruction algorithm. Steady-state free-precession cine-MRI of the heart was done in short-axis orientation. RV function could not be analyzed in one patient because of sternal wire artifacts in MRI. Mean end-diastolic (155.4+/-54.6 ml) and end-systolic (79.1+/-37.0 ml) RV volumes determined with MPR correlated well with MRI [151.9+/-53.7 ml (r=0.98) and 75.0+/-36.0 ml (r=0.96), respectively (P<0.001)]. RV stroke volume (76.2+/-20.2 ml for MPR-CT, 76.9+/-20.7 ml for MRI, r=0.93) showed a good correlation and RV ejection fraction (50.8+/-8.4% for MPR-CT, 51.9+/-7.4% for MRI, r=0.74) only a moderate one. Threshold supported 3D reconstructions revealed insufficient correlations with MRI (r=0.31-0.59). MPR-based semiautomated analysis of cardiac 16 detector-row CT allows for RV functional analysis. The results correlate well with MRI findings. Threshold value-supported 3D reconstructions did not show satisfying results because of inhomogeneities of RV contrast enhancement.
本研究的目的是通过使用两种不同的软件工具,利用16排CT测定右心室(RV)功能,并与MRI进行比较。19例患者接受了心脏CT检查。(1)使用半自动轮廓检测软件,从RR间期每10%处创建的短轴CT重建图像(MPR)中确定舒张末期和收缩末期RV容积。(2)将收缩末期和舒张末期的轴向图像转换为三维图像,使用阈值支持的重建算法确定容积。心脏的稳态自由旋进电影MRI采用短轴方向进行。由于MRI中存在胸骨钢丝伪影,一名患者无法分析RV功能。通过MPR测定的平均舒张末期(155.4±54.6 ml)和收缩末期(79.1±37.0 ml)RV容积与MRI结果相关性良好[分别为151.9±53.7 ml(r=0.98)和75.0±36.0 ml(r=0.96),P<0.001]。RV每搏输出量(MPR-CT为76.2±20.2 ml,MRI为7,6.9±20.7 ml,r=0.93)显示出良好的相关性,而RV射血分数(MPR-CT为50.8±8.4%,MRI为51.9±7.4%,r=0.74)仅为中等相关性。阈值支持的三维重建显示与MRI的相关性不足(r=0.31-0.59)。基于MPR的心脏16排CT半自动分析可进行RV功能分析。结果与MRI结果相关性良好。由于RV对比增强不均匀,阈值支持的三维重建未显示出满意的结果。