Barnett H J
John P. Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Neurol Clin. 1992 Feb;10(1):281-92.
The benefit of surgical procedures in preventing stroke is of concern to physicians, surgeons, and all health-care providers. The multicenter randomized trial has been applied in evaluating these strategies. Extracranial-intracranial anastomosis has failed to measure up to this rigid form of scientific scrutiny and the reasons for the demise of this procedure are reviewed. By contrast, for symptomatic disease of the internal carotid artery, patients with very severe stenosis are better treated by endarterectomy than with medical care alone. The ongoing North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) is reviewed and the compelling reasons to continue the trial for patients with moderate disease are outlined.
手术操作在预防中风方面的益处受到内科医生、外科医生及所有医疗服务提供者的关注。多中心随机试验已被用于评估这些策略。颅外-颅内吻合术未能达到这种严格的科学审查标准,本文将对该手术失败的原因进行回顾。相比之下,对于颈内动脉的症状性疾病,重度狭窄患者接受动脉内膜切除术比单纯药物治疗效果更好。本文将对正在进行的北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)进行回顾,并概述继续对中度疾病患者进行该试验的令人信服的理由。