Suppr超能文献

难民儿童与美国儿童的龋齿情况比较。

Dental caries of refugee children compared with US children.

作者信息

Cote Susan, Geltman Paul, Nunn Martha, Lituri Kathy, Henshaw Michelle, Garcia Raul I

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Health Services Research, Northeast Center for Research to Evaluate and Eliminate Dental Disparities, Boston University Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2004 Dec;114(6):e733-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0496.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Dental care is a major unmet health need of refugee children. Many refugee children have never received oral health care or been exposed to common preventive oral health measures, such as a toothbrush, fluoridated toothpaste, or fluoridated water. Oral health problems among refugee children are most likely to be detected first by pediatricians and family practitioners. Given the increased influx of refugees into the United States, particularly children, it is important for the pediatric community to be aware of potential oral health problems among refugee children and be able to make referrals for treatment and recommendations for the prevention of future oral diseases. The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of caries experience and untreated decay among newly arrived refugee children stratified by their region of origin and compared with US children.

METHODS

Oral health assessments were conducted within 1 month of arrival to the United States as part of the Refugee Health Assessment Program of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. The outcome variables include caries experience and untreated decay. Caries experience is determined by the presence of an untreated caries lesion, a restoration, or a permanent molar tooth that is missing because it has been extracted as a result of dental caries. Untreated caries is detected when 0.5 mm of tooth structure is lost and there is brown coloration of the walls of the cavity. Comparisons of the refugee children with US children in Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data were made using chi2 test of independence and multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Oral health screenings were performed on 224 newly arrived refugees who ranged in age from 6 months to 18 years and had a mean age of 10.6 years (SD: 4.82; median: 10.7 years). African refugees represented 53.6%, with the majority from Somalia, Liberia, and Sudan. Eastern European refugees composed 26.8% of the study sample. The remaining 19.6% come from a number of countries, such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Middle East. Refugee children had 51.3% caries experience and 48.7% with untreated decay. Caries experience in refugees varied by region of origin, with 38% from Africa exhibiting a history of caries compared with 79.7% of Eastern Europeans. The highest proportion of children with no obvious dental problems was from Africa (40.5%) compared with 16.9% from Eastern Europe. US children had caries experience similar to that of refugees (49.3%) but significantly lower risk of untreated decay (22.8%). Comparisons between refugee children and US children found significant differences for treatment urgency, untreated caries, extent of dental caries, and presence of oral pain. White refugee children, primarily from Eastern Europe, were 2.8 times as likely to have caries experience compared with white US children, with 9.4 times the risk of untreated decay compared with white US children. In contrast, African refugee children were only half as likely to have caries experience compared with white US children (95% confidence interval: 0.3-0.7) and African American children (95% confidence interval: 0.3-0.7). However, African refugee children were similar to African American children in risk of untreated decay (odds ratio: 0.94).

CONCLUSION

African refugee children had significantly lower dental caries experience as well as fewer untreated caries as compared with similarly aged Eastern European refugee children. They were also less likely to have ever been to a dentist. Possible reasons for these findings may include differences in exposure to natural fluoride in the drinking water, dietary differences, access to professional care, and cultural beliefs and practices. The prevalence of caries experience and untreated caries differed significantly between refugee children and US children. These differences varied significantly by race. When refugee children were compared with US children, the African refugee children had only half the caries experience of either white or African American children. However, African refugee children had similar likelihood of having untreated caries as compared with African American children, despite that very few African children had previous access to professional dental care. These findings are consistent with previous studies on health disparities in the United States. White refugee children, primarily from Eastern Europe, were also 3 times as likely to have caries experience compared with either white or African American children and were 9.4 times as likely to have untreated caries as white US children. Refugee children are more likely to establish primary medical care before seeking dental treatment. With the limited access to dental care among refugees, pediatricians should be particularly alert to the risk of oral diseases among refugee children.

摘要

目的

牙科护理是难民儿童一项未得到满足的主要健康需求。许多难民儿童从未接受过口腔保健,也未接触过常见的预防性口腔保健措施,如牙刷、含氟牙膏或含氟水。难民儿童的口腔健康问题最有可能首先被儿科医生和家庭医生发现。鉴于涌入美国的难民人数增加,尤其是儿童,儿科界了解难民儿童潜在的口腔健康问题并能够进行治疗转诊以及提出预防未来口腔疾病的建议非常重要。本研究的目的是描述新抵达的难民儿童中龋齿经历和未治疗龋齿的患病率,并按其原籍地区进行分层,同时与美国儿童进行比较。

方法

作为马萨诸塞州公共卫生部难民健康评估项目的一部分,在抵达美国后的1个月内进行口腔健康评估。结果变量包括龋齿经历和未治疗龋齿。龋齿经历通过存在未治疗的龋损、修复体或因龋齿而被拔除的恒牙来确定。当牙齿结构丧失0.5毫米且龋洞壁出现褐色时,可检测到未治疗龋齿。使用独立性卡方检验和多重逻辑回归对难民儿童与第三次全国健康和营养检查调查数据中的美国儿童进行比较。

结果

对224名新抵达的难民进行了口腔健康筛查,他们的年龄从6个月到18岁不等,平均年龄为10.6岁(标准差:4.82;中位数:10.7岁)。非洲难民占53.6%,大多数来自索马里、利比里亚和苏丹。东欧难民占研究样本的26.8%。其余19.6%来自多个国家,如阿富汗、巴基斯坦和中东地区。难民儿童有51.3%的龋齿经历,48.7%有未治疗龋齿。难民的龋齿经历因原籍地区而异,来自非洲的38%有龋齿病史,而东欧的这一比例为79.7%。没有明显牙齿问题的儿童比例最高的是非洲(40.5%),而东欧为16.9%。美国儿童的龋齿经历与难民相似(49.3%),但未治疗龋齿的风险显著较低(22.8%)。难民儿童与美国儿童之间的比较发现,在治疗紧迫性、未治疗龋齿、龋齿程度和口腔疼痛方面存在显著差异。主要来自东欧的白人难民儿童患龋齿经历的可能性是美国白人儿童的2.8倍,未治疗龋齿的风险是美国白人儿童的9.4倍。相比之下,非洲难民儿童患龋齿经历的可能性仅为美国白人儿童(95%置信区间:0.3 - 0.7)和非裔美国儿童(95%置信区间:0.3 - 0.7)的一半。然而,非洲难民儿童在未治疗龋齿风险方面与非裔美国儿童相似(优势比:0.94)。

结论

与年龄相仿的东欧难民儿童相比,非洲难民儿童的龋齿经历显著较低,未治疗的龋齿也较少。他们看牙医的可能性也较小。这些发现的可能原因包括饮用水中天然氟暴露的差异、饮食差异、获得专业护理的机会以及文化信仰和习俗。难民儿童和美国儿童在龋齿经历和未治疗龋齿的患病率上存在显著差异。这些差异因种族而异。当难民儿童与美国儿童进行比较时,非洲难民儿童的龋齿经历仅为白人或非裔美国儿童的一半。然而,尽管很少有非洲儿童以前能获得专业牙科护理,但非洲难民儿童与非裔美国儿童有未治疗龋齿的可能性相似。这些发现与美国先前关于健康差异的研究一致。主要来自东欧的白人难民儿童患龋齿经历的可能性也是白人或非裔美国儿童的3倍,未治疗龋齿的可能性是美国白人儿童的9.4倍。难民儿童在寻求牙科治疗之前更有可能建立初级医疗保健。由于难民获得牙科护理的机会有限,儿科医生应特别警惕难民儿童的口腔疾病风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验