Liu Jen-pei
Department of Agronomy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Biopharm Stat. 2004 Nov;14(4):857-67. doi: 10.1081/BIP-200035418.
In some new regions, an innovative drug of the original region was not marketed. However, after the patent of the innovative drug is expired, a generic copy of the innovative drug from the original region was introduced and approved for marketing in the new region. Another generic copy manufactured by the local sponsor of the new region is seeking for approval in the new region. Despite unavailability of the innovative drug, the regulatory authority of the new region still wants to approve the local generic copy based on assessment of bioequivalence between the local generic drug and the innovative drug. Following the bridging concept suggested by the ICH E5 guidance, we propose a method to evaluate average bioequivalence between the generic copy of the new region and the innovative drug of the original region using the generic copy of the original region as the bridging reference formulation. Sample size required by the bioequivalence study in the new region is also provided. Numerical examples illustrate the proposed method.
在一些新地区,原产地区的创新药物未在该地上市。然而,在创新药物专利到期后,原产地区创新药物的仿制药被引入并在新地区获批上市。新地区的当地申办者生产的另一种仿制药正在新地区寻求批准。尽管创新药物无法获取,但新地区的监管机构仍希望基于对当地仿制药与创新药物之间生物等效性的评估来批准当地仿制药。遵循国际人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)E5指南提出的桥接概念,我们提出一种方法,以原产地区的仿制药作为桥接参比制剂,来评估新地区仿制药与原产地区创新药物之间的平均生物等效性。文中还给出了新地区生物等效性研究所需的样本量。数值示例对所提方法进行了说明。