Addis Donna Rose, McIntosh Anthony R, Moscovitch Morris, Crawley Adrian P, McAndrews Mary Pat
Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Neuroimage. 2004 Dec;23(4):1460-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.007.
Conway (Conway, M.A., 1992. A structural model of autobiographical memory. In: Conway, M.A., Spinnler, H., Wagenaar, W.A. (Eds.), Theoretical Perspectives on Autobiological Memory. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 167-194) proposed that two types of autobiographical memories (AMs) exist within a hierarchical AM system: unique, specific events and repeated, general memories. There is little research on whether retrieval of these AMs relies on different neural substrates. To investigate this issue, we used a multivariate image analysis technique, spatiotemporal partial least squares (PLS), to identify distributed patterns of activity most related to AM tasks that we have found to be associated with a medial and left-lateralized network. Using PLS, specific and general memories were more strongly associated with different parts of this retrieval network. Specific AM retrieval was associated more with activation of regions involved in imagery in episodic memory, including the left precuneus, left superior parietal lobule and right cuneus, whereas general AM retrieval was associated with activation of the right inferior temporal gyrus, right medial frontal cortex, and left thalamus. These two patterns emerged at different lags after stimulus onset, with the general AM pattern peaking between 2 and 6 s, and the specific AM pattern between 6 and 8 s. These lag differences are consistent with Conway's theory which posits that general AMs are the preferred level of entry to the AM system. A seed PLS analysis revealed that the regions functionally connected to the hippocampus during retrieval did not differentiate specific from general AM retrieval, which confirms our earlier univariate analysis indicating that some aspects of the memory retrieval network are shared by these memories.
康威(康威,M.A.,1992年。自传体记忆的结构模型。见:康威,M.A.,斯平勒,H.,瓦格纳,W.A.(编),《自传体记忆的理论视角》。克鲁维尔学术出版社,荷兰多德雷赫特,第167 - 194页)提出,在一个层次化的自传体记忆(AM)系统中存在两种类型的自传体记忆:独特的、特定的事件和重复的、一般的记忆。关于这些自传体记忆的提取是否依赖于不同的神经基质,目前研究较少。为了研究这个问题,我们使用了一种多元图像分析技术,即时空偏最小二乘法(PLS),来识别与我们发现与内侧和左侧化网络相关的AM任务最相关的分布式活动模式。使用PLS,特定记忆和一般记忆与这个提取网络的不同部分有更强的关联。特定AM提取与情景记忆中涉及意象的区域激活更相关,包括左侧楔前叶、左侧顶上小叶和右侧楔叶,而一般AM提取与右侧颞下回、右侧内侧前额叶皮质和左侧丘脑的激活相关。这两种模式在刺激开始后的不同延迟时间出现,一般AM模式在2到6秒之间达到峰值,特定AM模式在6到8秒之间达到峰值。这些延迟差异与康威的理论一致,该理论认为一般AM是进入AM系统的首选水平。种子PLS分析表明,在提取过程中与海马体功能连接的区域并不能区分特定记忆和一般记忆的提取,这证实了我们早期的单变量分析,表明这些记忆共享记忆提取网络的某些方面。