Gazdag Gábor, Kocsis Nárcisz, Tolna Judit, Lipcsey Attila
Szt. László Hospital, Clinic for Addictology and Psychiatry, Budapest, Hungary.
J ECT. 2004 Dec;20(4):204-7. doi: 10.1097/00124509-200412000-00003.
Participants of a postgraduate biologic psychiatric course were surveyed about their attitudes toward electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) with a self-administered questionnaire. Among the respondents, 65 persons were specialists in psychiatry, 32% of whom would not consider using ECT even if they were in a psychotic depressive state. According to the bias factor, which has been calculated based on the answers to the 11 questions regarding attitudes, those psychiatrists who worked in inpatient care showed a less negative attitude. Among the items concerning knowledge of ECT, incorrect answers were most frequent to questions about myocardial infarction as a contraindication, and about the identity of the person who had pioneered this treatment. The negative attitude of Hungarian psychiatrists, especially of those who work in outpatient care, may have an important role in the decrease of the application of ECT in the past decade in Hungary.
通过一份自填式问卷,对一个研究生生物精神病学课程的参与者关于他们对电休克疗法(ECT)的态度进行了调查。在受访者中,65人是精神病学专家,其中32%的人即使处于精神病性抑郁状态也不会考虑使用ECT。根据基于关于态度的11个问题的答案计算出的偏差因素,那些在住院护理部门工作的精神科医生表现出的负面态度较少。在关于ECT知识的项目中,关于心肌梗死作为禁忌症以及关于开创这种治疗方法的人的身份的问题,错误答案最为常见。匈牙利精神科医生的负面态度,尤其是那些在门诊护理部门工作的医生的负面态度,可能在过去十年匈牙利ECT应用的减少中起到了重要作用。