Bolton-Smith C, Woodward M, Tunstall-Pedoe H
Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, U.K.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1992 Feb;46(2):75-84.
Identification of the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) from nutrients in the diet is of importance to both primary and secondary disease prevention. This paper reports the mean intakes and odds ratios for the macronutrients in groups of CHD-diagnosed, -undiagnosed and CHD-free men and women, aged 40-59 years, who participated in the Scottish Heart Health Study (n = 10,359). Diet was assessed by food frequency questionnaire and odds ratios were determined relative to the lowest quintile and adjusted for the classical CHD risk factors (+/- social class). Six per cent of the study population were CHD-diagnosed and 14.5% were identified as possible cases of undiagnosed CHD. The results suggest that change in diet as a result of diagnosis does occur, and is more pronounced in men. The effect is to give odds ratios, for diagnosed CHD, opposite to those which may be expected on the basis of current knowledge of nutrition and CHD risk. According to the intake data from the undiagnosed group, a relatively low energy intake, a high percentage of energy from protein and a moderate percentage of energy from alcohol diet are favourable factors with respect to CHD risk for men. For women, only alcohol significantly altered risk of undiagnosed CHD, and surprisingly, no measure of dietary fat showed a modifying effect on risk of undiagnosed CHD for men or for women. The implications, and influence of measurement error and variance on these results are discussed.
从饮食中的营养素识别冠心病(CHD)风险对一级和二级疾病预防均具有重要意义。本文报告了参与苏格兰心脏健康研究(n = 10359)的40 - 59岁已确诊冠心病、未确诊冠心病和无冠心病的男性及女性群体中常量营养素的平均摄入量和比值比。通过食物频率问卷评估饮食情况,并相对于最低五分位数确定比值比,并针对经典的冠心病风险因素(±社会阶层)进行调整。研究人群中有6%被诊断为冠心病,14.5%被确定为可能的未确诊冠心病病例。结果表明,确诊后饮食确实会发生变化,且在男性中更为明显。这种影响使得确诊冠心病的比值比与基于当前营养与冠心病风险知识所预期的相反。根据未确诊组的摄入量数据,相对较低的能量摄入、较高比例的蛋白质能量和适度比例的酒精能量饮食对男性冠心病风险而言是有利因素。对于女性,只有酒精显著改变了未确诊冠心病的风险,而且令人惊讶的是,没有任何膳食脂肪指标对男性或女性未确诊冠心病的风险显示出调节作用。本文讨论了测量误差和方差对这些结果的影响及意义。