Suppr超能文献

佐治亚州医疗补助计划人群中抗惊厥药物超说明书用药的流行病学调查。

An epidemiological investigation of off-label anticonvulsant drug use in the Georgia Medicaid population.

作者信息

Chen Hua, Deshpande Aparna D, Jiang Rong, Martin Bradley C

机构信息

Pharmacy Care Administration Graduate Program, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Sep;14(9):629-38. doi: 10.1002/pds.1051.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of off-label anticonvulsant drug use in the Georgia Medicaid population and establish what percentage of this off-label use is evidence-based. The second objective was to investigate differences in the prevalence of off-label use among anticonvulsants marketed before and after 1993. The third objective was to identify patient and physician characteristics associated with off-label use.

METHOD

The study design was a retrospective study utilizing pharmacy, inpatient, outpatient and long-term care claims linked with eligibility files for persons with Georgia Medicaid benefits in 1999 through 2000. An anticonvulsant recipient was considered an off-label anticonvulsant user if their anticonvulsant use did not match age or medical diagnoses in the product label. An evidence-based off-label use was defined as off-label anticonvulsant use supported by at least one randomized controlled clinical trial. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient and physician characteristics associated with off-label use.

RESULTS

34 676 (71.3%) of 48 648 patients on one or more anticonvulsants received an off-label prescription for an anticonvulsant. Gabapentin was the anticonvulsant most widely used off-label (86%). After accounting for labeled and all evidence-based uses for the six most frequently prescribed anticonvulsants, there was a moderate to large percentage of anticonvulsant use not supported by any evidence from controlled trials (range: 19.09-57.07%). The most common comorbidities among patients prescribed the top six anticonvulsants were diabetes mellitus, depression, schizophrenia and pain. Anticonvulsants launched after 1993 had a higher prevalence of off-label use than anticonvulsants marketed before 1993. Off-label drug use varied by age with children and adolescents being the most likely to receive an off-label anticonvulsant. Compared with other practitioners, neurologists were more likely to prescribe anticonvulsants off-label.

CONCLUSIONS

The anticonvulsant off-label use in the Georgia Medicaid population is very high (71%). Only a modest proportion of these off-label uses are supported by evidence from controlled trials.

摘要

目的

主要目标是确定佐治亚州医疗补助人群中抗惊厥药物的非标签使用情况,并确定这种非标签使用中有多大比例是基于证据的。第二个目标是调查1993年之前和之后上市的抗惊厥药物在非标签使用流行率上的差异。第三个目标是确定与非标签使用相关的患者和医生特征。

方法

本研究设计为一项回顾性研究,利用了1999年至2000年期间与佐治亚州医疗补助受益人的资格档案相关联的药房、住院、门诊和长期护理索赔数据。如果抗惊厥药物使用者的抗惊厥药物使用与产品标签中的年龄或医学诊断不匹配,则该使用者被视为非标签抗惊厥药物使用者。基于证据的非标签使用被定义为至少有一项随机对照临床试验支持的非标签抗惊厥药物使用。采用逻辑回归分析来确定与非标签使用相关的患者和医生特征。

结果

48648名使用一种或多种抗惊厥药物的患者中,有34676名(71.3%)接受了抗惊厥药物的非标签处方。加巴喷丁是使用最广泛的非标签抗惊厥药物(86%)。在考虑了六种最常用抗惊厥药物的标签规定用途和所有基于证据的用途后,有相当大比例的抗惊厥药物使用没有得到对照试验任何证据的支持(范围:19.09 - 57.07%)。开具六种最常用抗惊厥药物的患者中最常见的合并症是糖尿病、抑郁症、精神分裂症和疼痛。1993年之后上市的抗惊厥药物的非标签使用流行率高于1993年之前上市的抗惊厥药物。非标签药物使用因年龄而异,儿童和青少年最有可能接受非标签抗惊厥药物。与其他从业者相比,神经科医生更有可能开具非标签抗惊厥药物。

结论

佐治亚州医疗补助人群中抗惊厥药物的非标签使用非常高(71%)。这些非标签使用中只有一小部分有对照试验证据支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验