Suppr超能文献

在一项行为减肥计划中,关于食物血糖生成指数的教育未能改善治疗效果。

Education on the glycemic index of foods fails to improve treatment outcomes in a behavioral weight loss program.

作者信息

Carels Robert A, Darby Lynn A, Douglass Olivia M, Cacciapaglia Holly M, Rydin Sofia

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA.

出版信息

Eat Behav. 2005 Feb;6(2):145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.08.005.

Abstract

The glycemic index (GI) may play an important role in weight management by helping to control appetite and insulin levels. The impact of adding education on the GI of foods to a behavioral weight loss program (BWLP) was examined. Fifty-three obese, sedentary participants were randomly assigned to receive either a BWLP or a BWLP+GI education. Pre- and posttreatment weight loss, body fat, and diet were assessed. Weight loss and body fat were assessed at 1-year posttreatment. GI education had no significant impact on weight loss treatment outcomes at posttreatment or 1-year follow-up. Average weight loss was 7.6 kg (p<0.05). Participants in the BWLP+GI education group had significantly greater GI knowledge (p<0.05) and consumed foods with a lower average daily GI (p<0.05), than participants in the BWLP at posttreatment. At 1-year posttreatment, participants regained 59% of their posttreatment weight loss and 34% of their lost body fat. GI education did not improve BWLP treatment outcomes in this investigation.

摘要

血糖生成指数(GI)通过帮助控制食欲和胰岛素水平,可能在体重管理中发挥重要作用。研究了在行为减肥计划(BWLP)中加入食物血糖生成指数教育的影响。53名肥胖、久坐不动的参与者被随机分配接受BWLP或BWLP+GI教育。评估治疗前后的体重减轻、体脂和饮食情况。在治疗后1年评估体重减轻和体脂情况。GI教育在治疗后或1年随访时对减肥治疗结果没有显著影响。平均体重减轻7.6千克(p<0.05)。与治疗后BWLP组的参与者相比,BWLP+GI教育组的参与者具有显著更高的GI知识(p<0.05),且每日食用的食物平均GI更低(p<0.05)。在治疗后1年,参与者恢复了治疗后体重减轻的59%和体脂减少量的34%。在本研究中,GI教育并未改善BWLP的治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验