Green Amanda D, Colón-Emeric Cathleen S, Bastian Lori, Drake Matthew T, Lyles Kenneth W
Ambulatory Care Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
JAMA. 2004 Dec 15;292(23):2890-900. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.23.2890.
Although recent US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines recommend bone densitometry for all women older than 65 years, identifying younger women at increased risk for osteoporosis and women with occult vertebral fractures remains a clinical challenge. We investigated whether physical signs are useful as a screening tool either for early referral to bone densitometry or for occult spinal fractures.
To review the accuracy and precision of physical examination findings for the diagnosis of osteopenia, osteoporosis, or spinal fracture.
We conducted a MEDLINE search for articles published from 1966 through August 2004, manually reviewed bibliographies, consulted 4 clinical skills textbooks, and contacted experts in the field.
Studies were included if they contained adequate original data on the accuracy or precision of physical examination for diagnosing osteopenia, osteoporosis, or spinal fracture. Two authors screened abstracts found by the search. Fourteen of 191 full articles reviewed met inclusion criteria.
Two authors independently abstracted data from the included studies. Disagreements were resolved by discussion.
No single maneuver is sufficient to rule in or rule out osteoporosis or spinal fracture without further testing. The following yielded the greatest positive likelihood ratios (LR+): weight less than 51 kg, LR+, 7.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0-10.8); tooth count less than 20, LR+, 3.4 (95% CI, 1.4-8.0); rib-pelvis distance less than 2 finger breadths, LR+, 3.8 (95% CI, 2.9-5.1); wall-occiput distance greater than 0 cm, LR+, 4.6 (95% CI, 2.9-7.3), and self-reported humped back, LR+, 3.0 (95% CI, 2.2-4.1).
In patients who do not meet current bone mineral density screening recommendations, several convenient examination maneuvers, especially low weight, can significantly change the pretest probability of osteoporosis and suggest the need for earlier screening. Wall-occiput distance greater than 0 cm and rib-pelvis distance less than 2 fingerbreadths suggest the presence of occult spinal fracture.
尽管美国预防服务工作组最近的指南建议对所有65岁以上的女性进行骨密度测定,但识别骨质疏松风险增加的年轻女性以及隐匿性椎体骨折的女性仍然是一项临床挑战。我们调查了身体体征作为早期转诊进行骨密度测定或隐匿性脊柱骨折筛查工具是否有用。
回顾体格检查结果对诊断骨质减少、骨质疏松或脊柱骨折的准确性和精确性。
我们对1966年至2004年8月发表的文章进行了MEDLINE检索,人工查阅了参考文献,查阅了4本临床技能教科书,并联系了该领域的专家。
如果研究包含关于体格检查诊断骨质减少、骨质疏松或脊柱骨折的准确性或精确性的充分原始数据,则纳入研究。两位作者筛选了检索到的摘要。在191篇全文综述中,有14篇符合纳入标准。
两位作者独立从纳入研究中提取数据。分歧通过讨论解决。
没有单一的手法足以在不进行进一步检查的情况下确诊或排除骨质疏松或脊柱骨折。以下各项产生的阳性似然比(LR+)最高:体重低于51千克,LR+为7.3(95%置信区间[CI],5.0 - 10.8);牙齿数量少于20颗,LR+为3.4(95%CI,1.4 - 8.0);肋骨与骨盆距离小于2指宽,LR+为3.8(95%CI,2.9 - 5.1);墙与枕骨距离大于0厘米,LR+为4.6(95%CI,2.9 - 7.3),以及自我报告的驼背,LR+为3.0(95%CI,2.2 - 4.1)。
在不符合当前骨密度筛查建议的患者中,几种便捷的检查手法,尤其是体重过低,可以显著改变骨质疏松的预检概率,并提示需要更早进行筛查。墙与枕骨距离大于0厘米以及肋骨与骨盆距离小于2指宽提示存在隐匿性脊柱骨折。