Martins Mônica, Blais Régis, Leite Iúri da Costa
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2004;20 Suppl 2:S268-82. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2004000800021. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
Performance assessment in health services is essential. The comparison of performance indicators requires the use of risk adjustment strategies. The objective of this paper was to assess variations in clinical performance, measured by hospital mortality and length of stay, between private and public hospitals, while taking into account the hospital case mix. This study is located in the Ribeirão Preto region in São Paulo State, Brazil. From 1996 to 1998, 32,906 patients admitted with cardiovascular and respiratory diagnoses were studied. Variables used for risk adjustment of performance indicators were: sex, age, principal diagnosis, and severity measures based on co-morbidity. Clinical performance in public hospitals as measured by adjusted hospital mortality (OR = 0.41) was better than in private hospitals. Public and private hospitals were not statistically different concerning patients' length of stay. Although some conceptual and methodological problems persist, hospital mortality and other adjusted performance indicators should be considered as useful tools to identify health services' performance problems.
卫生服务中的绩效评估至关重要。绩效指标的比较需要使用风险调整策略。本文的目的是评估私立医院和公立医院之间以医院死亡率和住院时间衡量的临床绩效差异,同时考虑医院病例组合情况。本研究位于巴西圣保罗州的里贝朗普雷图地区。1996年至1998年,对32906例因心血管和呼吸系统疾病入院的患者进行了研究。用于绩效指标风险调整的变量包括:性别、年龄、主要诊断以及基于合并症的严重程度指标。经调整后的医院死亡率衡量,公立医院的临床绩效(比值比=0.41)优于私立医院。公立和私立医院在患者住院时间方面无统计学差异。尽管仍存在一些概念和方法上的问题,但医院死亡率和其他经调整的绩效指标应被视为识别卫生服务绩效问题的有用工具。