Suppr超能文献

免疫吸附疗法(IAS)作为系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的一种挽救治疗:关于安全性和有效性的考量

Immunoadsorption (IAS) as a rescue therapy in SLE: considerations on safety and efficacy.

作者信息

Stummvoll Georg H, Aringer Martin, Jansen Martin, Smolen Josef S, Derfler Kurt, Graninger Winfried B

机构信息

Deptartment of Rheumatology, University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004 Nov 30;116(21-22):716-24. doi: 10.1007/s00508-004-0232-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In SLE, extracorporeal procedures aiming at reduction of immunoglobulin (Ig) and immune complexes (IC) are used as a rescue therapy. Plasma exchange (PE) has not been proven overall effective in SLE, and long-term treatment in particular has been associated with severe bacterial and viral infections. Immunoadsorption (IAS), in contrast, selectively removes Ig and IC and may thus be safer. We therefore investigated the rate of infections in SLE patients who were undergoing long-term IAS.

METHODS

16 SLE patients were treated with > or = 10 courses of IAS, and nine patients with highly active disease received pulse cyclophosphamide (IVCP) therapy in parallel. We retrospectively analysed the records of all these patients for the occurrence of infections. Patients receiving IAS therapy plus IVCP were compared with 25 patients with similarly active disease treated with standard IVCP therapy within the same observation period. Patients receiving IAS without additional IVCP were compared with patients with similarly moderate disease activity receiving neither IAS nor IVCP.

RESULTS

No potentially life-threatening viral infection occurred in IAS-treated patients and episodes of herpes zoster were equally distributed. No severe infection was observed during IAS without concomittant cyclophosphamide. As expected, more patients with highly active disease receiving IVCP experienced infections than those with less active disease (16 of 34 [47%] vs. 2 of 22 [9%], p < 0.04). On comparing the two groups with highly active disease, infections were similar (IAS+IVCP: 3 of 9 patients [33%], IVCP only: 5 of 25 [20%]), but one patient receiving IAS+IVCP died of septicaemia. Disease activity significantly decreased in both groups treated with IAS.

CONCLUSION

IAS has an acceptable safety profile with regard to severe infections and appears safe with regard to severe viral disease. Highly active disease and IVCP therapy increase the risk of severe infections in SLE.

摘要

目的

在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)中,旨在降低免疫球蛋白(Ig)和免疫复合物(IC)的体外治疗方法被用作一种挽救疗法。血浆置换(PE)在SLE中尚未被证明总体有效,尤其是长期治疗与严重的细菌和病毒感染有关。相比之下,免疫吸附(IAS)可选择性去除Ig和IC,因此可能更安全。因此,我们调查了接受长期IAS治疗的SLE患者的感染率。

方法

16例SLE患者接受了≥10个疗程的IAS治疗,9例疾病高度活跃的患者同时接受了脉冲环磷酰胺(IVCP)治疗。我们回顾性分析了所有这些患者的感染发生记录。将接受IAS治疗加IVCP的患者与在同一观察期内接受标准IVCP治疗的25例疾病活动程度相似的患者进行比较。将未接受额外IVCP的IAS治疗患者与疾病活动程度中等、未接受IAS和IVCP治疗的患者进行比较。

结果

接受IAS治疗的患者未发生潜在危及生命的病毒感染,带状疱疹发作分布均匀。在未同时使用环磷酰胺的IAS治疗期间未观察到严重感染。正如预期的那样,接受IVCP治疗的疾病高度活跃的患者比疾病活动程度较低的患者感染更多(34例中的16例[47%]对22例中的2例[9%],p<0.04)。在比较两组疾病高度活跃的患者时,感染情况相似(IAS+IVCP:9例患者中的3例[33%],仅IVCP:25例中的5例[20%]),但1例接受IAS+IVCP治疗的患者死于败血症。接受IAS治疗的两组患者疾病活动度均显著降低。

结论

IAS在严重感染方面具有可接受的安全性,在严重病毒性疾病方面似乎也很安全。疾病高度活跃和IVCP治疗会增加SLE患者发生严重感染的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验