Richards Helen, King Gerry, Reid Margaret, Selvaraj Sivasubramaniam, McNicol Iain, Brebner Eileen, Godden David
Highlands and Islands Health Research Institute, Aberdeen University, UK.
Fam Pract. 2005 Feb;22(1):2-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh716. Epub 2005 Jan 10.
Health professionals in rural primary care could gain more from eHealth initiatives than their urban counterparts, yet little is known about eHealth in geographically isolated areas of the UK.
To elicit current use of, and attitudes towards eHealth of professionals in primary care in remote areas of Scotland.
In 2002, a questionnaire was sent to all general practitioners (n=154) in Scotland's 82 inducement practices, and to 67 nurses. Outcome measures included reported experience of computer use; access to, and experience of eHealth and quality of that experience; views of the potential usefulness of eHealth and perceived barriers to the uptake of eHealth.
Response rate was 87%. Ninety-five percent of respondents had used either the Internet or email. The proportions of respondents who reported access to ISDN line, scanner, digital camera, and videoconferencing unit were 71%, 48%, 40% and 36%, respectively. Use of eHealth was lower among nurses than GPs. Aspects of experience that were rated positively were 'clinical usefulness', 'functioning of equipment' and 'ease of use of equipment' (76%, 74%, and 74%, respectively). The most important barriers were 'lack of suitable training' (55%), 'high cost of buying telemedicine equipment' (54%), and 'increase in GP/nurse workload' (43%). Professionals were concerned about the impact of tele-consulting on patient privacy and on the consultation itself.
Although primary healthcare professionals recognize the general benefits of eHealth, uptake is low. By acknowledging barriers to the uptake of eHealth in geographically isolated settings, broader policies on its implementation in primary care may be informed.
农村基层医疗保健领域的卫生专业人员可能比城市同行从电子健康计划中获益更多,但对于英国地理上偏远地区的电子健康情况却知之甚少。
了解苏格兰偏远地区基层医疗保健专业人员当前对电子健康的使用情况及态度。
2002年,向苏格兰82个诱导性医疗实践机构的所有全科医生(n = 154)以及67名护士发放了问卷。结果指标包括报告的计算机使用经历;电子健康的获取情况、使用经历及该经历的质量;对电子健康潜在有用性的看法以及电子健康应用的感知障碍。
回复率为87%。95%的受访者使用过互联网或电子邮件。报告可使用综合业务数字网线路、扫描仪、数码相机和视频会议设备的受访者比例分别为71%、48%、40%和36%。护士对电子健康的使用低于全科医生。被积极评价的经历方面包括“临床有用性”、“设备功能”和“设备易用性”(分别为76%、74%和74%)。最重要的障碍是“缺乏合适的培训”(55%)、“购买远程医疗设备成本高”(54%)以及“全科医生/护士工作量增加”(43%)。专业人员担心远程会诊对患者隐私及会诊本身的影响。
尽管基层医疗保健专业人员认识到电子健康的总体益处,但应用率较低。通过认识到地理上偏远地区电子健康应用的障碍,可为基层医疗保健中电子健康实施的更广泛政策提供参考。