Plachot M
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Jean-Rostand, Sèvres, France.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004 Oct;33(6 Pt 2):3S32-5.
Until recently, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists were the only choice available to physicians for prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation. The recent approval of GnRH antagonists for this indication gives clinicians some new options. In several trials performed, the GnRH antagonist regimens have been associated with a slightly lower pregnancy and implantation rates than the established GnRH agonist protocols. This review summarizes the main studies concerning oocyte quality and fertilization in IVF cycles with GnRH antagonists. As a result, there is no difference between GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonists concerning oocyte maturation and fertilization rates. There are very few data about the incidence of oocyte morphology anomalies in IVF cycles with antagonists.
直到最近,促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂仍是医生在为接受控制性卵巢刺激的女性预防过早促黄体生成素(LH)峰时的唯一选择。GnRH拮抗剂近期获批用于这一适应症,为临床医生提供了一些新的选择。在已开展的多项试验中,GnRH拮抗剂方案的妊娠率和着床率略低于既定的GnRH激动剂方案。本综述总结了关于使用GnRH拮抗剂的体外受精(IVF)周期中卵母细胞质量和受精情况的主要研究。结果表明,在卵母细胞成熟和受精率方面,GnRH激动剂和GnRH拮抗剂之间没有差异。关于使用拮抗剂的IVF周期中卵母细胞形态异常发生率的数据非常少。