Gelijns Annetine C, Brown Lawrence D, Magnell Corey, Ronchi Elettra, Moskowitz Alan J
Columbia University, New York City, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):29-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.29.
In few fields of public policy are the use and cost of services so powerfully driven by technological change as they are in medicine. To manage technology, policy-makers have expanded their investment in evaluative research. This paper addresses three underexamined challenges in using evidence: those inherent in the dynamics of technological change itself; those inherent in the analytical enterprise; and the ways in which political factors shape the translation of evidence into policy decisions. The design of institutional arrangements and processes that seek to blend evidence with politics merit closer attention, and existing cross-national arrangements deserve careful study.
在公共政策的很少几个领域中,服务的使用和成本像在医学领域一样,受到技术变革如此强大的驱动。为了管理技术,政策制定者增加了对评估研究的投入。本文探讨了在使用证据方面三个未得到充分审视的挑战:技术变革动态本身所固有的挑战;分析工作所固有的挑战;以及政治因素将证据转化为政策决策的方式。旨在将证据与政治相结合的制度安排和流程设计值得更密切关注,现有的跨国安排也值得仔细研究。