Bredenoord A J, Weusten B L A M, Timmer R, Smout A J P M
Dept. of Gastroenterology, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005 Jun;288(6):G1190-4. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00478.2004. Epub 2005 Jan 13.
Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the most important mechanism by which gastroesophageal reflux occurs, and sleeve sensor manometry is the gold standard for detection of TLESRs. The aim of this study was to evaluate manometry with closely spaced sideholes (high-resolution manometry) for the detection of TLESRs as an alternative. In 12 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, a 90-min postprandial manometry was performed by using a catheter incorporating both a sleeve sensor and closely spaced sideholes in the esophagogastric junction. TLESRs recorded with both techniques were scored. Reflux during TLESRs was detected by using manometry (common cavity), intraluminal impedance, and pH monitoring. A total of 145 TLESRs were detected by using both techniques, 117 with high-resolution manometry and 108 with sleeve sensor manometry [not significant (NS)]. Manometric signs of reflux during TLESRs detected with high-resolution and sleeve sensor manometry were found in 62.4 and 56.5%, NS, respectively, versus 38.5 and 35.2%, NS on pH-metry and 70.1 and 60.2%, NS on impedance monitoring. TLESRs recognized only with high-resolution manometry were more often accompanied by reflux, as detected with manometry (59.5%) and impedance monitoring (67.6%), than TLESRs recognized only with sleeve sensor manometry (32.1 and 28.6%). High-resolution manometry is at least as accurate as sleeve sensor manometry for the detection of TLESRs.
短暂性下食管括约肌松弛(TLESRs)是胃食管反流发生的最重要机制,而套索传感器测压法是检测TLESRs的金标准。本研究的目的是评估使用间距紧密的侧孔(高分辨率测压法)检测TLESRs作为一种替代方法。在12例胃食管反流病患者中,使用一种在食管胃交界处同时包含套索传感器和间距紧密侧孔的导管进行了90分钟的餐后测压。对两种技术记录的TLESRs进行评分。通过测压法(共同腔)、腔内阻抗和pH监测来检测TLESRs期间的反流。两种技术共检测到145次TLESRs,高分辨率测压法检测到117次,套索传感器测压法检测到108次[无显著性差异(NS)]。高分辨率测压法和套索传感器测压法检测到的TLESRs期间反流的测压征象分别为62.4%和56.5%,无显著性差异,pH测量法分别为38.5%和35.2%,无显著性差异,阻抗监测分别为70.1%和60.2%,无显著性差异。仅通过高分辨率测压法识别的TLESRs比仅通过套索传感器测压法识别的TLESRs更常伴有反流,测压法(59.5%)和阻抗监测(67.6%)检测到的反流情况高于后者(32.1%和28.6%)。在检测TLESRs方面,高分辨率测压法至少与套索传感器测压法一样准确。