Langlais Frantz
Fédération de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, CHU de Rennes 35056 Rennes, France.
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2004;188(6):1011-22; discussion 1022-5.
Antibiotic-loaded bone cements (ALBC) were initially used empirically, both for the treatment of infected prostheses and for antibioprophylaxis. We conducted in vitro and animal studies as a prerequisite for proper clinical evaluation. We measured gentamicin diffusion from methacrylate bone cement, and found that the concentration in surrounding fluid was significantly above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). We then implanted ALBC in the proximal femora of 100 ewes, in conditions close to those of total hip replacement (THR). Antibiotic concentrations in bone were above 4 x MIC for more than 6 months. We subsequently measured antibiotic concentrations in drainage fluid, blood and urine samples from 50 patients undergoing THR. Concentrations were over 20 x MIC in periprosthetic fluid, but were below the detection limit in blood after 24 hours and in urine after one week. The blood concentration was less than 1 mg/l--far below the ototoxic and nephrotoxic threshold (8 mg/l). Having established antibiotic bioavailability, we then examined the clinical efficacy of ALBC. We participated in several studies, including a French multicentric review of 342 THR procedures (direct and two-stage exchanges). ALBC was beneficial in both settings, with an 85% infection control rate. This included patients with very severe infections (multiresistant strains, severe osteolysis) treated with two-stage exchanges; and moderate infections treated by direct exchange. (This latter procedure offers fewer complications, more durable functional results, a shorter hospital stay and lower treatment costs.) We also used ALBC for antibioprophylaxis in over 2000 THR procedures, and noted no complications. This method is now being assessed in more than 200 000 cases contained in the Swedish THR Register. The experimental methods that we developed (laboratory studies, animal implantation, clinical pharmacokinetics) set the groundwork for clinical studies of gentamicin ABLC, and also allowed us to develop other ALBC formats, containing vancomycin, for example (restricted to salvage therapy). We also used these methods to evaluate antibiotic-loaded bone substitutes (calcium and carbon phosphates), designed not only to control infectious osteitis but also to replace osteolytic bone.
载抗生素骨水泥(ALBC)最初是凭经验使用的,用于治疗感染的假体以及抗生素预防。作为恰当临床评估的前提,我们进行了体外和动物研究。我们测量了庆大霉素从甲基丙烯酸酯骨水泥中的扩散情况,发现周围液体中的浓度显著高于最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。然后,我们在100只母羊的股骨近端植入了ALBC,植入条件接近全髋关节置换(THR)的情况。骨中的抗生素浓度在超过6个月的时间里高于4倍MIC。随后,我们测量了50例行THR患者引流液、血液和尿液样本中的抗生素浓度。假体周围液体中的浓度超过20倍MIC,但24小时后血液中的浓度低于检测限,一周后尿液中的浓度也低于检测限。血液浓度低于1mg/L,远低于耳毒性和肾毒性阈值(8mg/L)。在确定了抗生素的生物利用度后,我们接着研究了ALBC的临床疗效。我们参与了多项研究,包括一项对342例THR手术(直接置换和两阶段置换)的法国多中心回顾性研究。ALBC在两种情况下都有益,感染控制率为85%。这包括通过两阶段置换治疗的非常严重感染(多重耐药菌株、严重骨溶解)的患者,以及通过直接置换治疗的中度感染患者。(后一种手术并发症更少,功能结果更持久,住院时间更短,治疗成本更低。)我们还在2000多例THR手术中使用ALBC进行抗生素预防,未发现并发症。目前,瑞典THR登记处有超过20万例病例正在对这种方法进行评估。我们开发的实验方法(实验室研究、动物植入、临床药代动力学)为庆大霉素ALBC的临床研究奠定了基础,也使我们能够开发其他ALBC形式,例如含万古霉素的(仅限于挽救治疗)。我们还使用这些方法评估了载抗生素骨替代物(钙和磷酸碳),其设计目的不仅是控制感染性骨炎,还能替代溶骨性骨。