Kim Min Young, Dong Min, Dedon Peter C, Wogan Gerald N
Biological Engineering Division and Chemistry Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2005 Jan;18(1):76-86. doi: 10.1021/tx049777m.
Peroxynitrite (ONOO-) induces oxidative and nitrosative DNA damage, and previous studies by our group have shown that it is strongly mutagenic in the supF shuttle vector pSP189 replicated in Escherichia coli MBL50 cells. In those experiments, however, the pSP189 plasmid was exposed under unphysiological conditions to large single bolus doses of ONOO-, which limits extrapolation of the data to in vivo pathological states in which ONOO- may play a role. We have thus sought to define the effects of ONOO- dose and dose rate on the DNA damage and mutations induced in the supF gene by three different dosage mechanisms: (i) by infusion of ONOO- solution into suspensions of pSP189 at rates approximating those estimated to occur in inflamed tissues; (ii) by exposure to 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1), which generates ONOO- spontaneously during decomposition; and (iii) by bolus doses of ONOO- solution. In all cases, plasmid DNA was exposed in the presence of 25 mM bicarbonate, since the reaction of CO2 with ONOO- (to form nitrosoperoxycarbonate) has a major impact on mutagenic potency of ONOO- in this system. Nucleobase and deoxyribose damage were evaluated by a plasmid nicking assay immediately after ONOO- and SIN-1 exposures. Mutation frequency (MF) and mutational spectra in the supF gene were determined after plasmid pSP189 replicated in host E. coli cells. Bolus ONOO- addition caused the highest amount of DNA damage, including base and deoxyribose lesions, while infusion caused the least. SIN-1 was found to induce almost exclusively deoxyribose oxidation, while bolus addition generated a high percentage of base damage. MF increased in a dose-dependent manner following all treatments, but infused ONOO- and SIN-1 exposures were less mutagenic than bolus ONOO- exposure. MFs induced by infusion and by SIN-1 incubated for 100 min at the highest level (4 mM) were 63 and 43% less, respectively, than that induced by bolus. All mutational hot spots were located at G:C sites except for A121 and A177 induced by SIN-1 exposure. Hot spots at C108 and C168 were common to all exposures; G113, G115, and G116 were common to bolus and infused ONOO- exposures; and G129 was common to infused ONOO- and SIN-1 exposures. Almost all mutations were single base pair substitutions under all exposure conditions. Whereas those induced by infused or bolus ONOO- and SIN-1 consisted predominantly of G:C to T:A transversions (66, 65, and 51%, respectively), G:C to C:G mutations were much less frequent following infusion and SIN-1 (8 and 19%, respectively) than those induced by bolus exposure (29%). A:T to T:A mutations induced were detected only after ONOO- infusion and SIN-1 exposure (9 and 11%, respectively). In conclusion, both dose and dose rate at which a genetic target is exposed to ONOO- substantially influence the damage and mutational response, indicating that these parameters will need to be taken into account in assessing the potential effects of ONOO- in vivo. Furthermore, the results indicate that the chemistry of SIN-1-induced DNA damage differs substantially from native ONOO-, which suggests the need for caution in interpreting the biological relevance of SIN-1 as a surrogate for ONOO-.
过氧亚硝酸盐(ONOO⁻)会引发氧化性和亚硝化性DNA损伤,我们小组之前的研究表明,在大肠杆菌MBL50细胞中复制的supF穿梭载体pSP189中,它具有很强的致突变性。然而,在那些实验中,pSP189质粒在非生理条件下暴露于大剂量单次推注的ONOO⁻,这限制了将数据外推至ONOO⁻可能起作用的体内病理状态。因此,我们试图通过三种不同的给药机制来确定ONOO⁻剂量和剂量率对supF基因中诱导的DNA损伤和突变的影响:(i)以接近炎症组织中估计发生的速率将ONOO⁻溶液注入pSP189悬浮液中;(ii)暴露于3 - 吗啉代 - 亚硝基胍(SIN - 1),其在分解过程中自发产生ONOO⁻;(iii)推注ONOO⁻溶液。在所有情况下,质粒DNA在25 mM碳酸氢盐存在下暴露,因为CO₂与ONOO⁻的反应(形成亚硝基过氧碳酸盐)对该系统中ONOO⁻的诱变效力有重大影响。在ONOO⁻和SIN - 1暴露后,立即通过质粒切口测定法评估核碱基和脱氧核糖损伤。在宿主大肠杆菌细胞中复制质粒pSP189后,测定supF基因中的突变频率(MF)和突变谱。推注添加ONOO⁻导致的DNA损伤量最高,包括碱基和脱氧核糖损伤,而注入导致的损伤最少。发现SIN - 1几乎只诱导脱氧核糖氧化,而推注添加则产生高比例的碱基损伤。所有处理后MF均呈剂量依赖性增加,但注入ONOO⁻和SIN - 1暴露的致突变性低于推注ONOO⁻暴露。在最高水平(4 mM)下孵育100分钟,注入ONOO⁻和SIN - 1诱导的MF分别比推注诱导的低63%和43%。除SIN - 1暴露诱导的A121和A177外,所有突变热点均位于G:C位点。C108和C168处的热点在所有暴露中都很常见;G113、G115和G116在推注和注入ONOO⁻暴露中很常见;G129在注入ONOO⁻和SIN - 1暴露中很常见。在所有暴露条件下,几乎所有突变都是单碱基对替换。注入或推注ONOO⁻和SIN - 1诱导的突变主要由G:C到T:A颠换组成(分别为66%、65%和51%),注入和SIN - 1后G:C到C:G突变的频率(分别为8%和19%)远低于推注暴露诱导的频率(29%)。仅在ONOO⁻注入和SIN - 1暴露后检测到诱导的A:T到T:A突变(分别为9%和11%)。总之,遗传靶点暴露于ONOO⁻的剂量和剂量率都会极大地影响损伤和突变反应,这表明在评估ONOO⁻在体内的潜在影响时需要考虑这些参数。此外,结果表明SIN - 1诱导的DNA损伤化学性质与天然ONOO⁻有很大不同,这表明在将SIN - 1作为ONOO⁻的替代物解释其生物学相关性时需要谨慎。