Pitzalis Sabrina, Di Russo Francesco, Spinelli Donatella
IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Centro Ricerche di Neuropsicologia, via Ardeatina 306, 00174 Rome, Italy.
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jun;163(4):527-34. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2207-4. Epub 2005 Jan 15.
One to four vertical bars were tachistoscopically presented at various eccentricities along the horizontal meridian to patients with right brain damage and neglect (n=7) and to a control group of right brain damaged patients without neglect (n=4). Luminance contrast stimuli and isoluminant chromatic contrast stimuli were used. The patients' task was to report the number of bars. With luminance stimuli the neglect patients' discrimination in the left visual field was reduced, particularly at the most leftward position tested (ca 20 degrees ) where about 20% of the bars were omitted. The loss of information was limited to luminance contrast stimuli. When chromatic contrast stimuli were used, accuracy was comparable in the two hemifields and between groups of patients. The differential pattern of results for chromatic and luminance contrast stimuli is consistent with the hypothesis of a selective deficit of the magno-cellular pathway in neglect.
通过速示器向患有右脑损伤及忽视症的患者(n = 7)以及无忽视症的右脑损伤对照组患者(n = 4)在水平子午线上的不同偏心度处呈现1至4条垂直线条。使用了亮度对比刺激和等亮度颜色对比刺激。患者的任务是报告线条的数量。对于亮度刺激,忽视症患者在左视野的辨别能力下降,特别是在测试的最左侧位置(约20度),约20%的线条被遗漏。信息丢失仅限于亮度对比刺激。当使用颜色对比刺激时,两个半视野以及患者组之间的准确性相当。颜色和亮度对比刺激的不同结果模式与忽视症中大细胞通路选择性缺陷的假设一致。