Shi Leiyu, Stevens Gregory D
Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Med Care. 2005 Feb;43(2):193-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200502000-00014.
Previous studies have confirmed the independent associations of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and potential access with the receipt of preventive care. More pragmatic models of vulnerability are needed to examine the concomitant influence of multiple risk factors.
To operationalize vulnerability as risk profiles of predisposing (race/ethnicity and education) and enabling (eg, income, health insurance, and having a regular source of care) factors, and their association with the receipt of preventive care.
Cross-sectional data on 14,983 adults from the Household Component of the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
Receipt of recommended preventive care: blood pressure and cholesterol screening, flu shot, Papanicolaou test, mammogram, and dental visit.
Controlling for other factors, analyses of risk profiles revealed a clear dose-response relationship with the receipt of preventive care regardless of race/ethnicity. In the total sample, having more risk factors was associated with a lower prevalence of, for example, receiving a cholesterol screening: 1 risk (PR=0.77; CI, 0.71-0.84), 2 risks (PR=0.56; CI, 0.49-0.64), and 3+ risks (PR=0.34; CI, 0.25-0.43).
Sizeable disparities in the receipt of recommended preventive services were found in relation to increasing vulnerability risk profiles. Without attention to such co-occurring risks, it is unlikely that substantial gains will be made in reducing disparities in the incidence of and mortality from the most common preventable diseases in the United States.
以往研究已证实种族/族裔、社会经济地位及潜在可及性与预防性保健服务的接受情况之间存在独立关联。需要更实用的脆弱性模型来检验多种风险因素的共同影响。
将脆弱性定义为易患因素(种族/族裔和教育程度)及促成因素(如收入、医疗保险和有固定的医疗服务来源)的风险概况,并研究其与预防性保健服务接受情况的关联。
来自1996年医疗支出小组调查家庭部分的14983名成年人的横断面数据。
接受推荐的预防性保健服务情况:血压和胆固醇筛查、流感疫苗接种、巴氏试验、乳房X线检查和牙科就诊。
在控制其他因素后,风险概况分析显示,无论种族/族裔如何,与预防性保健服务的接受情况都存在明显的剂量反应关系。在总样本中,风险因素越多,接受胆固醇筛查等服务的患病率越低:1个风险因素(PR = 0.77;CI,0.71 - 0.84),2个风险因素(PR = 0.56;CI,0.49 - 0.64),3个及以上风险因素(PR = 0.34;CI,0.25 - 0.43)。
发现接受推荐的预防性服务方面存在相当大的差异,与脆弱性风险概况增加有关。如果不关注这些同时存在的风险,在美国最常见的可预防疾病的发病率和死亡率方面缩小差距就不太可能取得实质性进展。