Laver Joseph H, Kraveka Jacqueline M, Hutchison Robert E, Chang Myron, Kepner James, Schwenn Molly, Tarbell Nancy, Desai Sunil, Weitzman Sheila, Weinstein Howard J, Murphy Sharon B
Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Virginia, PO Box 980646, Richmond, VA 23298-0646, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jan 20;23(3):541-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.075.
The Pediatric Oncology Group adopted a histology-based approach to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and treated patients with advanced large-cell lymphoma on a separate protocol (doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, 6-mercaptopurin, and methotrexate; APO regimen). In this study, we assessed the effects of an intense antimetabolite therapy alternating with APO on overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) and looked into biologic correlates.
From December 1994 to April 2000, we enrolled 180 eligible pediatric patients with stage III/IV large-cell lymphoma (LCL); 90 patients were randomly assigned to the intermediate-dose methotrexate (IDM) and high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) arm, 85 patients to the APO arm, and five patients directly to the APO arm by study design due to CNS involvement. Planned therapy duration was 12 months.
The 4-year EFS for all patients was 67.4% (SE, 4.2%), and OS was 80.1% (SE, 3.6%) without any significant difference between the two arms. The 4-year EFS and OS were 71.8% (SE, 6.1%) and 88.1% (SE, 4.4%), respectively, for patients with anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, and 63.8% (SE, 10.3%) and 70.3% (SE, 9.0%), respectively, for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Only 11 patients required radiation (due to unresponsive bulky disease or CNS involvement). The IDM/HiDAC arm was associated with more toxicity.
The efficacy of incorporating IDM/HiDAC in the treatment plan of pediatric and adolescent patients with advanced-stage LCL was inconclusive as to its effect on EFS, regardless of the lymphoma phenotype. It cannot be excluded that with a higher number of patients, one treatment could prove superior and future studies will build on these data.
儿童肿瘤学组采用基于组织学的方法治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤,并通过单独的方案(阿霉素、长春新碱、泼尼松、6-巯基嘌呤和甲氨蝶呤;APO方案)治疗晚期大细胞淋巴瘤患者。在本研究中,我们评估了与APO交替进行的强化抗代谢物疗法对总生存期(OS)和无事件生存期(EFS)的影响,并探究了生物学相关性。
1994年12月至2000年4月,我们纳入了180例符合条件的III/IV期大细胞淋巴瘤(LCL)儿科患者;90例患者被随机分配至中剂量甲氨蝶呤(IDM)和高剂量阿糖胞苷(HiDAC)组,85例患者被分配至APO组,另有5例因中枢神经系统受累根据研究设计直接进入APO组。计划治疗时长为12个月。
所有患者的4年EFS为67.4%(标准误,4.2%),OS为80.1%(标准误,3.6%),两组之间无显著差异。间变性大细胞淋巴瘤患者的4年EFS和OS分别为71.8%(标准误,6.1%)和88.1%(标准误,4.4%),弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的4年EFS和OS分别为63.8%(标准误,10.3%)和70.3%(标准误,9.0%)。仅11例患者需要放疗(由于难治性大块病灶或中枢神经系统受累)。IDM/HiDAC组的毒性更大。
在晚期LCL的儿科和青少年患者治疗方案中加入IDM/HiDAC,无论淋巴瘤表型如何,其对EFS的影响尚无定论。不能排除的是,随着患者数量增加,一种治疗方法可能被证明更具优势,未来的研究将基于这些数据展开。