Kofler Markus, Poustka Katharina
Department of Neurology, Hospital Hochzirl A-6170 Zirl, Austria.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Feb;116(2):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.004.
The cutaneous silent period (CSP) is a spinal inhibitory reflex mediated by A-delta fibers. The exact underlying neural pathway, however, is unknown. This study was undertaken to investigate whether the neural circuitry mediating CSPs is wired unilaterally or whether there is evidence of influence from or upon the contralateral side.
Fifteen healthy subjects underwent bilateral CSP testing following unilateral nociceptive digit II stimulation. Surface electromyographic (EMG) recordings were obtained bilaterally from thenar muscles following unilateral recurrent nociceptive digit II stimulation while activating the ipsilateral or the contralateral or both thenar muscles against resistance.
Nociceptive digit II stimulation evoked consistent CSPs in ipsilateral thenar muscles during voluntary contraction, while there was no consistent influence on EMG activity in contralateral thenar muscles at rest. Furthermore, nociceptive digit II stimulation did neither consistently affect EMG activity in ipsilateral thenar muscles at rest nor in contralateral thenar muscles during voluntary contraction. Finally, there was no significant difference between any CSP parameters obtained during unilateral versus bilateral muscle contraction. Occasional late excitatory EMG activity in relaxed or contracted thenar muscles resembled startle reflexes, which seem to contribute to the post-inhibition EMG-rebound.
The present findings are consistent with unilateral wiring of the spinal circuitry mediating CSPs.
The essential lack of a crossed inhibitory influence of nociceptive digit II stimulation underscores the utility of CSP testing in the assessment of the A-delta fiber system in healthy subjects and patients with various pathologies.
皮肤静息期(CSP)是一种由Aδ纤维介导的脊髓抑制性反射。然而,其确切的潜在神经通路尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨介导CSP的神经回路是单侧连接的,还是有来自对侧或对侧有影响的证据。
15名健康受试者在单侧伤害性刺激示指II后进行双侧CSP测试。在单侧反复伤害性刺激示指II时,双侧记录拇短展肌的表面肌电图(EMG),同时让同侧或对侧或双侧拇短展肌对抗阻力收缩。
在自愿收缩期间,伤害性刺激示指II在同侧拇短展肌中诱发一致的CSP,而在对侧拇短展肌静息时对EMG活动没有一致的影响。此外,伤害性刺激示指II在静息时对同侧拇短展肌的EMG活动或在自愿收缩时对对侧拇短展肌的EMG活动均无一致影响。最后,单侧与双侧肌肉收缩期间获得的任何CSP参数之间均无显著差异。在放松或收缩的拇短展肌中偶尔出现的晚期兴奋性EMG活动类似于惊吓反射,这似乎导致了抑制后EMG反弹。
本研究结果与介导CSP的脊髓回路单侧连接一致。
伤害性刺激示指II基本缺乏交叉抑制影响,突出了CSP测试在评估健康受试者和各种病理患者的Aδ纤维系统中的实用性。