Appel Arthur G
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849-5413, USA.
J Econ Entomol. 2004 Dec;97(6):2035-42. doi: 10.1093/jee/97.6.2035.
The effects of contamination of insecticidal bait formulations, by using mint oil and silica aerogel, were evaluated in a series of laboratory experiments against the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.). Bait consumption at 3 d for uncontaminated baits ranged from 0.01 g for Avert dust to 0.399 g for Combat dry bait with hydramethylnon presented in a station. LT50 values for uncontaminated gel bait deposits ranged from 0.4 d for PreEmpt containing imidacloprid to 4.1 d for Maxforce containing hydramethylnon. As a group, significantly more gel bait was consumed than solid formulations even when both formulations had similar concentrations of the same active ingredient. As a result, gel baits were significantly more toxic than solid formulations. Application of mint oil directly to bait deposits significantly decreased bait consumption and increased overall LT50 values. When bait formulation types were examined individually, there was no difference in consumption or toxicity between contaminated and uncontaminated gel formulations. Contaminated solid baits, however, had significantly greater LT50 values and less consumption than uncontaminated solid baits. Gel formulations probably absorbed the contaminants and removed them from the surface of the bait deposits resulting in normal bait consumption and toxicity. Gel and solid bait deposits, inside plastic exposure stations or alone with no station and placed onto mint oil-contaminated substrates, had significantly lower bait consumption and greater LT50 values than baits placed on uncontaminated substrates. Contamination of a baited area is more likely than contamination of just the bait deposit and therefore a more realistic test of the effects of contamination on bait performance. The importance of contamination to the performance of cockroach baits is discussed.
在一系列实验室实验中,评估了使用薄荷油和二氧化硅气凝胶对杀虫诱饵制剂进行污染后,对德国小蠊(Blattella germanica (L.))的影响。未受污染诱饵在3天时的摄食量,从Avert粉剂的0.01克到放置在诱捕器中的含氟蚁腙的Combat干诱饵的0.399克不等。未受污染的凝胶诱饵沉积物的半数致死时间(LT50)值,从含吡虫啉的PreEmpt的0.4天到含氟蚁腙的Maxforce的4.1天不等。总体而言,即使两种制剂具有相同活性成分的相似浓度,凝胶诱饵的消耗量也显著高于固体制剂。因此,凝胶诱饵的毒性显著高于固体制剂。将薄荷油直接施用于诱饵沉积物会显著降低诱饵消耗量,并增加总体LT50值。当单独检查诱饵制剂类型时,受污染和未受污染的凝胶制剂在消耗量或毒性方面没有差异。然而,受污染的固体诱饵比未受污染的固体诱饵具有显著更高的LT50值和更低的消耗量。凝胶制剂可能吸收了污染物并将其从诱饵沉积物表面去除,从而导致正常的诱饵消耗和毒性。与放置在未受污染基质上的诱饵相比,放置在塑料暴露诱捕器内或单独放置且无诱捕器并置于薄荷油污染基质上的凝胶和固体诱饵沉积物,其诱饵消耗量显著更低,LT50值更高。诱饵区域受到污染的可能性大于仅诱饵沉积物受到污染的可能性,因此对污染对诱饵性能影响的测试更具现实意义。本文讨论了污染对蟑螂诱饵性能的重要性。