Kumps A, Vamos E, Mardens Y, Abramowicz M, Genin J, Duez P
Laboratoire de Biochimie Médicale, Institut de Pharmacie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels.
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2004;27(5):567-79. doi: 10.1023/b:boli.0000042981.52186.a9.
We assessed the reliability of a method designed for common electron-impact GC-MS systems to determine in a single run most organic acids and glycine conjugates of clinical interest in amniotic fluid. Suitable sensitivity was achieved by dividing the selected-ion chromatogram into 12 time segments during which the monitoring dwelt on specific ions. Twelve metabolites were simultaneously quantified in amniotic fluid, with performances ranging from very good to clinically acceptable. The total coefficient of variation was 2.5-14.1% and the detection limit was well below the lower value of the physiological range. For five other metabolites, the precision was lower and/or the detection limit was near the physiological range. The method was clinically assessed by the prenatal detection of three cases of tyrosinaemia type I and one case of propionic acidaemia. Analytical and clinical evaluation of the method showed that GC-MS with electron-impact fragmentation can be an informative analytical approach for low-level organic acids in physiological fluids. Apart from the case of glycine conjugates, the method shows a fair reliability for amniotic fluid analysis, which might warrant its use for prenatal diagnosis of organic acidurias. However, this method cannot replace procedures using isotopic internal standards, nor GC-MS based on chemical ionization fragmentation, which remain confirmatory analytical methods of choice.
我们评估了一种为普通电子轰击气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC - MS)系统设计的方法的可靠性,该方法能够在一次运行中测定羊水中大多数具有临床意义的有机酸和甘氨酸共轭物。通过将选择离子色谱图划分为12个时间段,并在这些时间段内对特定离子进行监测,实现了合适的灵敏度。在羊水中同时对12种代谢物进行了定量分析,其性能从非常好到临床可接受不等。总变异系数为2.5 - 14.1%,检测限远低于生理范围的下限值。对于其他5种代谢物,精密度较低和/或检测限接近生理范围。通过对3例I型酪氨酸血症和1例丙酸血症的产前检测对该方法进行了临床评估。该方法的分析和临床评估表明,具有电子轰击碎裂功能的GC - MS对于生理体液中的低水平有机酸可能是一种有用的分析方法。除了甘氨酸共轭物的情况外,该方法在羊水分析中显示出一定的可靠性,这可能使其适用于有机酸尿症的产前诊断。然而,该方法不能替代使用同位素内标物的程序,也不能替代基于化学电离碎裂的GC - MS,后者仍然是首选的确证分析方法。