Bayley Matthew D, Schwartz J Sanford, Shofer Frances S, Weiner Mark, Sites Frank D, Traber K Bobbi, Hollander Judd E
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, The Wharton School.
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;45(2):110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.09.010.
We determined the additional cost of an extended emergency department (ED) length of stay for chest pain patients awaiting non-ICU, monitored (telemetry) beds.
This was a prospective cohort study of all ED chest pain patients aged 24 years or older and admitted to a telemetry bed in an urban university hospital during a 12-month period. Structured ED data collection included demographics, chest pain presentation, medical history, and laboratory test and ECG results. Hospital course was monitored daily, followed by a 30-day telephone follow-up. Risk severity scores (Goldman, Acute Cardiac Ischemia-Time-Insensitive Predictive Instrument, and Charlson) were calculated. Hospital charges, real costs, and revenues were obtained at discharge and 2 years later. The main outcome measure was risk-adjusted additional cost to the hospital of a delayed ED admission. Clinical outcome was a secondary measure.
Of the 817 patients with chest pain presenting to the ED during the study period, there were 904 hospitalizations. Of these, 825 patients waited more than 3 hours for their bed (91%). There were 21 patient visits with a final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. ED length of stay was not associated with total hospital length of stay (r =0.01), hospital costs, or hospital or professional charges, revenues, or collection rates. The annual opportunity cost in lost hospital revenue for chest pain patients was 168,300 US dollars (204 US dollars per patient waiting >3 hours for a hospital bed).
Extended ED length of stay demonstrated no association with total hospital costs or revenues or total hospital length of stay but imposed substantial ED opportunity costs, with decreased potential revenue. Interventions that reduce ED delays in hospital admissions have the potential to significantly increase hospital revenues.
我们确定了胸痛患者在等待非重症监护病房(ICU)的监测(遥测)床位时急诊科(ED)延长住院时间所产生的额外费用。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为一所城市大学医院在12个月期间年龄在24岁及以上且入住遥测床位的所有急诊科胸痛患者。结构化的急诊科数据收集包括人口统计学信息、胸痛表现、病史以及实验室检查和心电图结果。每天监测住院过程,随后进行30天的电话随访。计算风险严重程度评分(戈德曼评分、急性心肌缺血-时间不敏感预测工具评分和查尔森评分)。在出院时和2年后获取医院收费、实际成本和收入。主要结局指标是急诊科延迟入院对医院造成的风险调整后的额外成本。临床结局是次要指标。
在研究期间到急诊科就诊的817例胸痛患者中,有904次住院。其中,825例患者等待床位超过3小时(91%)。有21例患者最终诊断为急性心肌梗死。急诊科住院时间与总住院时间(r = 0.01)、医院成本、医院或专业收费、收入或收款率均无关联。胸痛患者每年因医院收入损失产生的机会成本为168,300美元(每位等待床位超过3小时的患者为204美元)。
急诊科住院时间延长与医院总成本、收入或总住院时间均无关联,但造成了大量的急诊科机会成本,潜在收入减少。减少急诊科住院延迟的干预措施有可能显著增加医院收入。