Haq S, Bhatt R M, Vaishnav K G, Yadav R S
Malaria Research Centre, Field Station, Civil Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
J Vector Borne Dis. 2004 Sep-Dec;41(3-4):61-6.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Two bacterial larvicide (bio-larvicide) formulations--Bacticide and VectoBac containing viable endospores and delta endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis var israelensis H-14 were evaluated in 2001 for their mosquito larvicidal efficacy under the operational conditions of urban malaria control programme in Surat city, India.
Larvicides were applied at the recommended dose in selected breeding habitats of Anopheles (An. stephensi), Aedes (Ae. aegypti) and Culex (Cx. quinquefasciatus) and reductions in the densities of III and IV instars were compared with that of untreated matched controls.
At the construction sites in cemented tanks/chambers VectoBac produced reduction in the density of III and IV instar larvae of An. stephensi (98-100%) and Ae. aegypti (100%) in the first week of application whereas Bacticide produced 71-100% reduction in An. stephensi and 100% in Ae. aegypti. Re-application of VectoBac on Day 10 caused better control up to Day 20 when compared with Bacticide. In stagnant water pools, VectoBac produced 27.6-85.3% reduction in the larvae of An. subpictus and 18.5-83.8% in those of Cx. quinquefasciatus whereas Bacticide produced 23.3-30.3% and 39-97.2% reduction in An. subpictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus larval densities in the first week post application, respectively. Bacticide application gave better impact on Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae in the second week after re-application as compared to VectoBac. In storm water drains, VectoBac caused respectively 6.2-100% and 6.4-97.6% reduction in An. subpictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae in the first week of application whereas Bacticide produced 100% and 13.3-98.8% reduction in An. subpictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus larval densities, respectively.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Both the formulations were equally effective on An. subpictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae after a second application. The results showed that application of these biolarvicides would be required at 7-10 day intervals. The health workers engaged in the application of biolarvicides reported a better ease of handling and application of the liquid formulation (VectoBac) than the wettable powder formulation (Bacticide).
2001年,对两种细菌杀幼虫剂(生物杀幼虫剂)制剂——含有苏云金芽孢杆菌以色列变种H - 14活芽孢和δ内毒素的Bacticide和VectoBac,在印度苏拉特市城市疟疾控制项目的实际操作条件下,评估其对蚊虫幼虫的杀灭效果。
在按蚊(斯氏按蚊)、伊蚊(埃及伊蚊)和库蚊(致倦库蚊)选定的孳生地,以推荐剂量施用杀幼虫剂,并将三龄和四龄幼虫密度的降低情况与未处理的配对对照进行比较。
在水泥池/水泥房的建筑工地,施用第一周,VectoBac使斯氏按蚊三龄和四龄幼虫密度降低了98 - 100%,埃及伊蚊降低了100%;而Bacticide使斯氏按蚊降低了71 - 100%,埃及伊蚊降低了100%。与Bacticide相比,第10天重新施用VectoBac在第20天前能实现更好的控制效果。在积水池中,VectoBac使伪杂鳞库蚊幼虫密度降低了27.6 - 85.3%,致倦库蚊降低了18.5 - 83.8%;而施用第一周,Bacticide使伪杂鳞库蚊和致倦库蚊幼虫密度分别降低了23.3 - 30.3%和39 - 97.2%。重新施用后第二周,与VectoBac相比,Bacticide对致倦库蚊幼虫的影响更好。在雨水排水道中,施用第一周,VectoBac使伪杂鳞库蚊和致倦库蚊幼虫密度分别降低了6.2 - 100%和6.4 - 97.6%;而Bacticide使伪杂鳞库蚊和致倦库蚊幼虫密度分别降低了100%和13.3 - 98.8%。
再次施用后,两种制剂对伪杂鳞库蚊和致倦库蚊幼虫的效果相当。结果表明,这些生物杀幼虫剂需每隔7 - 10天施用一次。从事生物杀幼虫剂施用工作的卫生工作者报告称,与可湿性粉剂制剂(Bacticide)相比,液体制剂(VectoBac)在操作和施用方面更简便。