Patel M, Lee C K
National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, C/R Eggleston and Mills Roads, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2600.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD001093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001093.pub2.
Randomised trials carried out over two decades ago showed that the polysaccharide vaccine prevented serogroup A meningococcal meningitis. Subsequent non-randomised studies, however, suggested significant variations in the age-specific duration of protection among young children.
The aim of the review was to determine the effect of polysaccharide serogroup A vaccine for preventing serogroup A meningococcal meningitis. The specific objectives were to assess the age-specific effects of the vaccine, the effect of booster doses in children under five years of age, and the duration of protection in children and adults.
In 2004, the review was updated. The following databases were searched for records of new trials: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2004); MEDLINE (January 1966 to November Week 1 2004); and EMBASE (January 1990 to September 2004).
The first stage of the review included randomised trials. The second stage included non- randomised studies that addressed specific outcomes not answered by the randomised trials.
One reviewer assessed the methodological quality of the randomised trials and two reviewers independently identified and assessed the non-randomised studies. Of the twelve eligible Randomized trials, four were excluded because of the high risk of bias in assessing vaccine efficacy. Data from the trials were pooled using the Exact method to assess vaccine efficacy at one, two and three years post vaccination. Of the 15 non-randomised studies, only two addressed the specific objectives not answered by the randomised trials but were assessed to be at high risk of bias.
The protective effect within the first year of vaccination was consistent across the randomised trials, and the summary vaccine efficacy was 95% (95% confidence interval (CI) 87% to 99%). Protection extended into the second and third year after vaccination but the results did not attain statistical significance. The vaccine was protective in Finnish children aged 3 months to five years. The latter was also the only trial that assessed the effect of a booster dose in children under two years of age but lacked power to yield statistically significant results. The vaccine was protective in one- to five-year old children in developing countries (Nigeria and Sudan) but the age-specific efficacy in strata between one and five years of age could not be determined.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For the first year after vaccination, the polysaccharide serogroup A vaccine was strongly protective against serogroup A meningococcal meningitis in participants over five years of age. It was also protective beyond the first year after vaccination in this age group but the level of vaccine efficacy could not be determined with precision. Children aged one to five years in developing countries were also protected but the level of efficacy in this age group could not be determined. While the vaccine was strongly protective among children aged three months to five years in developed countries the level of efficacy across age strata within this age group could not be determined. The number of children aged under two years was too small to draw conclusions on the protective effect of a booster dose of vaccine.
二十多年前开展的随机试验表明,多糖疫苗可预防A群脑膜炎球菌性脑膜炎。然而,随后的非随机研究表明,幼儿中按年龄划分的保护期存在显著差异。
本综述的目的是确定A群多糖疫苗预防A群脑膜炎球菌性脑膜炎的效果。具体目标是评估疫苗按年龄划分的效果、五岁以下儿童加强剂量的效果以及儿童和成人的保护期。
2004年对本综述进行了更新。检索了以下数据库以获取新试验的记录:Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)(2004年第4期《Cochrane图书馆》);MEDLINE(1966年1月至2004年11月第1周);以及EMBASE(1990年1月至2004年9月)。
综述的第一阶段包括随机试验。第二阶段包括针对随机试验未回答的特定结局的非随机研究。
一名评审员评估随机试验的方法学质量,两名评审员独立识别和评估非随机研究。在12项符合条件的随机试验中,有4项因评估疫苗效力时存在高偏倚风险而被排除。使用精确方法汇总试验数据,以评估接种疫苗后1年至3年的疫苗效力。在15项非随机研究中,只有2项涉及随机试验未回答的特定目标,但被评估为存在高偏倚风险。
在随机试验中,接种疫苗后第一年的保护效果是一致的,汇总疫苗效力为95%(95%置信区间(CI)87%至99%)。保护作用延伸至接种疫苗后的第二和第三年,但结果未达到统计学显著性。该疫苗对3个月至5岁的芬兰儿童具有保护作用。这也是唯一一项评估两岁以下儿童加强剂量效果的试验,但缺乏得出统计学显著结果的效力。该疫苗对发展中国家(尼日利亚和苏丹)1至5岁的儿童具有保护作用,但无法确定1至5岁各年龄层的特定效力。
接种疫苗后的第一年,A群多糖疫苗对五岁以上参与者的A群脑膜炎球菌性脑膜炎具有很强的保护作用。在该年龄组接种疫苗后的第一年之后也具有保护作用,但疫苗效力水平无法精确确定。发展中国家1至5岁的儿童也受到了保护,但该年龄组的效力水平无法确定。发达国家3个月至5岁的儿童中疫苗具有很强的保护作用,但无法确定该年龄组内各年龄层的效力水平。两岁以下儿童的数量过少,无法就疫苗加强剂量的保护作用得出结论。