De Trizio Ella, Brennan Christopher S
Dechert LLP, Princeton, NJ, USA.
J Biolaw Bus. 2004;7(4):14-22.
Few sciences have held out such therapeutic promise and correspondingly stirred so much controversy in countries throughout the world as the developing science surrounding human embryonic stem cells. Since the first reported development of several lines of human embryonic stem cells in 1988, many governments around the world have attempted to address the thorny ethical issues raised by human embryonic stem cell research by the passage of laws. In some cases these laws have directly regulated governmental funding of the science; in other cases they have created a legal environment that has either encouraged or discouraged both governmental and private funding of the science. This article first differentiates human embryonic stem cells from other types of stem cells and frames the ethical controversy surrounding human embryonic stem cell research, then surveys laws governing human embryonic stem cell research in various scientifically advanced countries located throughout the Pacific Rim, Europe and North America and explains the impact these laws have had on governmental and private funding of human embryonic stem cell research.
很少有科学领域能像围绕人类胚胎干细胞的新兴科学那样,展现出如此巨大的治疗前景,并在世界各国引发如此多的争议。自1988年首次报道成功培育出多株人类胚胎干细胞系以来,世界上许多国家的政府都试图通过立法来解决人类胚胎干细胞研究引发的棘手伦理问题。在某些情况下,这些法律直接规范了政府对该科学领域的资金投入;在其他情况下,它们营造了一种法律环境,这种环境或鼓励或阻碍了政府和私人对该科学领域的资金投入。本文首先将人类胚胎干细胞与其他类型的干细胞区分开来,并阐述围绕人类胚胎干细胞研究的伦理争议,接着考察环太平洋地区、欧洲和北美的各个科学发达国家中有关人类胚胎干细胞研究的法律,并解释这些法律对政府和私人资助人类胚胎干细胞研究所产生的影响。