Suppr超能文献

七氟烷、地氟烷或丙泊酚麻醉下罗库溴铵的作用持续时间。

Rocuronium duration of action under sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol anaesthesia.

作者信息

Maidatsi P G, Zaralidou A Th, Gorgias N K, Amaniti E N, Karakoulas K A, Giala M M

机构信息

AHEPA University Hospital, Anaesthesiology Department, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Oct;21(10):781-6. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504000055.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We conducted a prospective randomized study to evaluate whether the duration of action of a single bolus dose of rocuronium is influenced by maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol infusion.

METHODS

Fifty-seven ASA I-II patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were enrolled in this study. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental 3-5 mg kg(-1) or propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1) and fentanyl 5 microg kg(-1) and tracheal intubation was facilitated with rocuronium 0.9 mg kg(-1). Thereafter patients were randomly allocated to three different groups to receive sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol for maintenance of anaesthesia. Recovery of neuromuscular function was monitored by single twitch stimulation of the ulnar nerve and by recording the adductor pollicis response using accelerometry. Intergroup recovery times to 5% of control value of single twitch were analysed using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

The mean (95% confidence interval) recovery time to 5% of control value of single twitch during desflurane anaesthesia was 90.18 (86.11-94.25) min. Significantly shorter recovery times were observed during sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia, 58.86 (54.73-62.99) min and 51.11 (45.47-56.74) min, respectively (P < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the recovery time between groups receiving desflurane vs. sevoflurane (P < 0.001) and desflurane vs. propofol (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Desflurane anaesthesia significantly prolongs the duration of action of rocuronium at 0.9 mg kg(-1) single bolus dose, compared to sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia maintenance regimens.

摘要

背景与目的

我们开展了一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估七氟醚、地氟醚或丙泊酚输注维持麻醉时,单次推注剂量罗库溴铵的作用持续时间是否会受到影响。

方法

本研究纳入了57例接受择期腹部手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I-II级患者。使用硫喷妥钠3-5mg/kg或丙泊酚2.5mg/kg及芬太尼5μg/kg诱导麻醉,并用罗库溴铵0.9mg/kg辅助气管插管。此后,将患者随机分为三组,分别接受七氟醚、地氟醚或丙泊酚维持麻醉。通过对尺神经进行单次颤搐刺激,并使用加速度计记录拇内收肌反应来监测神经肌肉功能的恢复情况。采用方差分析及Bonferroni校正分析组间单次颤搐恢复至对照值5%的时间。

结果

地氟醚麻醉期间,单次颤搐恢复至对照值5%的平均(95%置信区间)时间为90.18(86.11-94.25)分钟。七氟醚或丙泊酚麻醉期间观察到明显更短的恢复时间,分别为58.86(54.73-62.99)分钟和51.11(45.47-56.74)分钟(P<0.001)。接受地氟醚与七氟醚的组间恢复时间也存在显著差异(P<0.001),地氟醚与丙泊酚组间也有显著差异(P<0.001)。

结论

与七氟醚或丙泊酚麻醉维持方案相比,地氟醚麻醉显著延长了0.9mg/kg单次推注剂量罗库溴铵的作用持续时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验