Reddel H K, Vincent S D, Civitico J
Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Thorax. 2005 Feb;60(2):164-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.030437.
Peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring is recommended in asthma guidelines as a tool for assessing severity, monitoring response to treatment, detecting exacerbations, identifying triggers, and providing objective justification for treatment to the patient, but some clinicians have expressed concerns about its relevance in the management of asthma. We have identified a sevenfold variation in the scale of existing PEF charts, with resulting wide variation in the appearance of the same PEF date on different charts. There is an obvious need for standardisation of PEF charts to avoid confusion for patients and to allow development of pattern recognition skills by clinicians. Evidence is provided from visual perception studies to suggest that preference should be given to a horizontally compressed PEF chart to facilitate identification of exacerbations and of overall trends, but this needs to be formally evaluated by retrospective and prospective studies. It is hoped that clinical expertise in PEF pattern recognition can eventually be incorporated into electronic decision making algorithms, as has occurred in occupational asthma, but, in the meantime, the ideal PEF chart for asthma management will represent a compromise between ease of manual data entry and ease of interpretation.
哮喘指南推荐使用呼气峰值流速(PEF)监测作为评估病情严重程度、监测治疗反应、检测病情加重、识别触发因素以及向患者提供治疗客观依据的工具,但一些临床医生对其在哮喘管理中的相关性表示担忧。我们发现现有PEF图表的刻度存在7倍的差异,导致同一PEF数据在不同图表上的外观差异很大。显然需要对PEF图表进行标准化,以避免患者混淆,并使临床医生能够培养模式识别技能。视觉感知研究提供的证据表明,应优先选择水平压缩的PEF图表,以方便识别病情加重情况和总体趋势,但这需要通过回顾性和前瞻性研究进行正式评估。希望PEF模式识别方面的临床专业知识最终能够纳入电子决策算法,就像职业性哮喘那样,但与此同时,用于哮喘管理的理想PEF图表将在便于手动数据输入和便于解读之间达成妥协。