Jain Anil K, Sinha Skand
Department of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, Delhi 110-095, India.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Feb(431):57-65. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000152868.29134.92.
The problems in infected nonunion include multiple sinuses, osteomyelitis, bone and soft tissue loss, osteopenia, adjacent joint stiffness, complex deformities, limb-length inequalities, and multidrug-resistant polybacterial infection. Bone gap and active infection are the crucial factors relating to treatment and prognosis. Gaps larger than 4 cm likely cannot be effectively bridged by corticocancellous bone grafting. If the limb has intact distal circulation and sensation, limb salvage and reconstruction generally is preferable to amputation. The fracture generally unites if adequate debridement of the nonunion site is done with fracture stabilization and bone grafting. We reviewed 42 consecutive patients with infected nonunion of the long bones. These patients have been categorized into two groups. Type A is infected nonunion of long bones with nondraining (quiescent) infection, with or without implant in situ; Type B is infected nonunion of long bones with draining (active) infection. Both are classified further into two subtypes: 1) nonunion with a bone gap smaller than 4 cm or 2) nonunion with a bone gap larger than 4 cm. Single-stage debridement and bone grafting with fracture stabilization are the methods of choice for Type A1 infected nonunions. Adequate debridement, fracture stabilization, and second-stage bone grafting gives desirable results in Type B1 infected nonunions. Distraction histiogenesis is the preferred procedure for Type A2 and B2. The autogenous nonvascularized fibular graft, posterolateral bone grafting for the tibia, and centralization of the ulna over distal radial remnant (single bone forearm) may be good treatment options in selected cases.
感染性骨不连的问题包括多处窦道、骨髓炎、骨与软组织缺损、骨质减少、相邻关节僵硬、复杂畸形、肢体长度不等以及耐多药混合细菌感染。骨缺损和活动性感染是与治疗及预后相关的关键因素。大于4厘米的骨缺损可能无法通过皮质松质骨移植有效桥接。如果肢体远端循环和感觉完好,保肢重建通常优于截肢。如果对骨不连部位进行充分清创、骨折固定并植骨,骨折一般能够愈合。我们回顾了42例连续性长骨感染性骨不连患者。这些患者被分为两组。A型为长骨感染性骨不连,伴有无引流(静止)感染,原位有无植入物;B型为长骨感染性骨不连,伴有引流(活动)感染。两者又进一步分为两个亚型:1)骨缺损小于4厘米的骨不连或2)骨缺损大于4厘米的骨不连。一期清创、植骨并骨折固定是A型1感染性骨不连的首选治疗方法。充分清创、骨折固定及二期植骨对B型1感染性骨不连可取得理想效果。牵张组织生成术是A型2和B型2的首选治疗方法。自体非血管化腓骨移植、胫骨后外侧植骨以及尺骨向桡骨远端残端中心化(单骨前臂)在特定病例中可能是较好的治疗选择。