Sarubbi Berardo, D'Alto Michele, Vergara Pasquale, Calvanese Raimondo, Mercurio Barbara, Russo Maria Giovanna, Calabrò Raffaele
Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Second University of Naples, Monaldi Hospital, Via Egiziaca a Pizzofalcone, 11, 80132 Naples, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2005 Feb 15;98(2):207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.10.017.
Diagnostic assessment and treatment have been described in detail in symptomatic WPW syndrome, but little information exists about significance and prognosis of an incidentally found ventricular pre-excitation (VPE) in asymptomatic children. The aim of the study was to evaluate, retrospectively, the role of electrophysiological study (EPS) in the assessment of the arrhythmic risk in asymptomatic patients with VPE.
Sixty-two asymptomatic children and adolescents (38 M/24 F, aged 9.8+/-5.1 years) referred to our Division between 1996 and 2002 for an incidentally found VPE underwent an EPS for arrhythmic risk stratification. The following parameters were examined: anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory pathway (AP), the 1-to-1 conduction over the AP, the inducibility of atrio-ventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT) and the inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) with measurement of minimal RR between two consecutive preexcitated QRS complexes, the average RR interval of all cycles, and the percentage of preexcitated QRS complexes.
During the EPS, 36 patients (58.1%) experienced sustained SVT. The tachycardia was initiated in the basal state in 22 patients and after isoproterenol in the other 14. Orthodromic AVRT (cycle length 305.9+/-48.5 ms) was recorded in 29 patients. In three patients, both orthodromic and antidromic AVRT were recorded, with different cycle length (CL). Antidromic AVRT alone (CL 239.5+/-13.7 ms) was recorded in four patients. AF was recorded in nine patients: in six patients, it was recorded after the induction of orthodromic or antidromic AVRT, in the other three cases AF was the first and only arrhythmic event. The minimal RR between two consecutive pre-excitated QRS ranged between 250-230 ms (mean 237.5+/-9.6 ms). In the 26 patients who presented no induced sustained tachycardia in the EPS, the 1:1 conduction over the AP ranged between 210 and 600 ms (mean 279.6+/-75.2 ms).
Electrophysiological evaluation remains the gold standard for assessing risk of life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with VPE. However, a high proportion of healthy children and adolescents with VPE can experience sustained AVRT and/or AF during EPS. These results raise questions about the necessity of an aggressive treatment approach to prevent those "rare" cases of sudden death.
有症状的预激综合征(WPW)的诊断评估和治疗已得到详细描述,但关于无症状儿童偶然发现的心室预激(VPE)的意义和预后的信息却很少。本研究的目的是回顾性评估电生理检查(EPS)在评估无症状VPE患者心律失常风险中的作用。
1996年至2002年间,62例因偶然发现VPE而转诊至我科的无症状儿童和青少年(38例男性/24例女性,年龄9.8±5.1岁)接受了EPS以进行心律失常风险分层。检查了以下参数:旁路(AP)的前传有效不应期、AP上的1:1传导、房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)的诱发以及房颤(AF)的诱发,并测量两个连续预激QRS波群之间的最小RR间期、所有心动周期的平均RR间期以及预激QRS波群的百分比。
在EPS期间,36例患者(58.1%)发生了持续性室上性心动过速(SVT)。22例患者在基础状态下诱发了心动过速,另外14例在使用异丙肾上腺素后诱发。29例患者记录到了顺向型AVRT(心动周期长度305.9±48.5毫秒)。3例患者记录到了顺向型和逆向型AVRT,心动周期长度(CL)不同。4例患者仅记录到逆向型AVRT(CL 239.5±13.7毫秒)。9例患者记录到了房颤:6例患者在诱发顺向型或逆向型AVRT后记录到房颤,另外3例房颤是首个也是唯一的心律失常事件。两个连续预激QRS波群之间的最小RR间期在250 - 230毫秒之间(平均237.5±9.6毫秒)。在EPS中未诱发持续性心动过速的26例患者中,AP上的1:1传导在210至600毫秒之间(平均279.6±75.2毫秒)。
电生理评估仍然是评估VPE患者危及生命心律失常风险的金标准。然而,相当一部分患有VPE的健康儿童和青少年在EPS期间可能会发生持续性AVRT和/或房颤。这些结果引发了关于采取积极治疗方法以预防那些“罕见”猝死病例的必要性的疑问。