Brahan Denise, Bauchner Howard
Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e163-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1437.
The recognition of health disparities as an important aspect of US health care has led to renewed interest in the reporting of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) in original research reports.
To describe reporting of race/ethnicity and SES, in comparison with age and gender, and to report changes with time.
All original research articles that focused on children and asthma that were published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, The New England Journal of Medicine, Pediatrics, The Journal of Pediatrics, and Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine were reviewed for 2 time periods, 1991-1993 and 2000-2002. Each report was assessed for coding of age, gender, race/ethnicity (number of groups and which groups), and SES.
In 1991-1993, 27 reports met the inclusion criteria; in 2000-2002, 74 were reviewed. Overall, significantly more reports described age (90.1%) and gender (78.2%) than SES (41.6%) and race/ethnicity (54.5%). During the 2 study periods, there were significant increases in studies reporting race/ethnicity (from 29.6% to 63.5%) but not in studies reporting SES or gender. Coding of race/ethnicity, even in the later time period, was largely confined to white (78.7%) and black (89.4%). Fewer reports coded Latino (55.3%) or Asian (14.9%). Only 2 of the 31 articles that coded Latino subjects contained information on ethnic subgroups, whereas none of the 8 articles included Asian subgroups.
Original research reports in a specific area (asthma) for which health disparities have been well documented still contain few data on race/ethnicity and SES, particularly in comparison with age and gender. There has been some improvement in the past decade in the reporting of race/ethnicity, but the reporting of Latino and Asian subgroups remains poor. If we are to understand health disparities, then more appropriate reporting of SES and race/ethnicity is necessary.
健康差异作为美国医疗保健的一个重要方面,这一认识使得人们对在原创研究报告中报告种族/族裔和社会经济地位(SES)重新产生兴趣。
描述种族/族裔和SES的报告情况,并与年龄和性别报告情况作比较,同时报告随时间的变化。
对发表在《美国医学会杂志》《新英格兰医学杂志》《儿科学》《儿科学杂志》和《儿科学与青少年医学档案》上的所有聚焦于儿童与哮喘的原创研究文章进行两个时间段的回顾,即1991 - 1993年和2000 - 2002年。对每份报告进行年龄、性别、种族/族裔(分组数量及具体分组)和SES编码的评估。
1991 - 1993年,27份报告符合纳入标准;2000 - 2002年,共审查了74份报告。总体而言,描述年龄(90.1%)和性别的报告显著多于描述SES(41.6%)和种族/族裔的报告(54.5%)。在这两个研究时间段内,报告种族/族裔的研究显著增加(从29.6%增至63.5%),但报告SES或性别的研究未增加。即使在后期,种族/族裔编码主要局限于白人(78.7%)和黑人(89.4%)。对拉丁裔(55.3%)或亚裔(14.9%)进行编码的报告较少。在对拉丁裔受试者进行编码的31篇文章中,只有2篇包含族裔亚组信息,而在8篇涉及亚裔亚组的文章中,没有一篇包含相关信息。
在一个健康差异已得到充分记录的特定领域(哮喘)的原创研究报告中,关于种族/族裔和SES的数据仍然很少,特别是与年龄和性别相比。在过去十年中,种族/族裔报告方面有了一些改善,但拉丁裔和亚裔亚组的报告情况仍然不佳。如果我们想要了解健康差异,那么更恰当地报告SES和种族/族裔是必要的。