Leite Marcelo
Ciências Sociais, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Genet Mol Res. 2004 Dec 30;3(4):575-81.
The literature about genomics and bioinformatics achievements in high-impact journals such as Nature and Science has raised disproportionate expectations amongst the general public about fast and revolutionary drugs and breakthroughs in biomedicine. However, the yield obtained by database mining activities has been modest, as reported in the February 2001 issues of these journals featuring the completion of human genome draft sequences by the Human Genome Project Consortium and the company Celera. I have compared changes in rethoric employed by molecular biologists in 2001 and in April 2003, when the final sequence was announced. The comparison suggests that researchers are concerned about the sustainability of society's investment in this field, though not explicitly.
诸如《自然》和《科学》等高影响力期刊上有关基因组学和生物信息学成果的文献,在普通公众中引发了对快速且具有革命性的药物以及生物医学突破的过高期望。然而,正如这些期刊2001年2月那几期所报道的那样,数据库挖掘活动所取得的成果并不显著,当时这些期刊以人类基因组计划联盟和塞雷拉公司完成人类基因组草图序列为特色。我比较了分子生物学家在2001年以及2003年4月(最终序列公布之时)所使用措辞的变化。这种比较表明,研究人员虽未明确表达,但他们担心社会在该领域投资的可持续性。