Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P, Jacquemont S, Joubert M, David A, Frebourg T, Rival J M
Service de Génétique Médicale, Institut de Biologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 9, quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes Cedex, France.
J Med Genet. 2005 Feb;42(2):121-8. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.025478.
Malformations are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in full term infants and genomic imbalances are a significant component of their aetiology. However, the causes of defects in many patients with multiple congenital malformations remain unexplained despite thorough clinical examination and laboratory investigations.
We used a commercially available array based comparative genomic hybridisation method (array CGH), able to screen all subtelomeric regions, main microdeletion syndromes, and 201 other regions covering the genome, to detect submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances in 49 fetuses with three or more significant anomalies and normal karyotype.
Array CGH identified eight genomic rearrangements (16.3%), all confirmed by quantitative multiplex PCR of short fluorescent fragments. Subtelomeric and interstitial deletions, submicroscopic duplications, and a complex genomic imbalance were identified. In four de novo cases (15qtel deletion, 16q23.1-q23.3 deletion, 22q11.2 deletion, and mosaicism for a rearranged chromosome 18), the genomic imbalance identified clearly underlay the pathological phenotype. In one case, the relationship between the genotype and phenotype was unclear, since a subtelomeric 6q deletion was detected in a mother and her two fetuses bearing multiple malformations. In three cases, a subtelomeric 10q duplication, probably a genomic polymorphism, was identified.
The detection of 5/49 causative chromosomal imbalances (or 4/49 if the 6qtel deletion is not considered as causative) suggests wide genome screening when standard chromosome analysis is normal and confirms that array CGH will have a major impact on pre and postnatal diagnosis as well as providing information for more accurate genetic counselling.
畸形是足月儿发病和死亡的主要原因,基因组失衡是其病因的重要组成部分。然而,尽管进行了全面的临床检查和实验室检查,许多患有多种先天性畸形的患者的缺陷原因仍未得到解释。
我们使用了一种基于微阵列的比较基因组杂交方法(阵列比较基因组杂交),该方法能够筛查所有亚端粒区域、主要的微缺失综合征以及覆盖基因组的201个其他区域,以检测49例具有三种或更多显著异常且核型正常的胎儿中的亚微观染色体失衡。
阵列比较基因组杂交鉴定出8种基因组重排(16.3%),所有这些重排均通过短荧光片段的定量多重聚合酶链反应得到证实。鉴定出了亚端粒和间质缺失、亚微观重复以及复杂的基因组失衡。在4例新发病例(15号染色体亚端粒缺失、16q23.1 - q23.3缺失、22q11.2缺失以及18号重排染色体的嵌合体)中,鉴定出的基因组失衡显然是病理表型的基础。在1例病例中,基因型与表型之间的关系尚不清楚,因为在一位母亲及其两个患有多种畸形的胎儿中检测到了6号染色体亚端粒缺失。在3例病例中,鉴定出了可能是基因组多态性的10号染色体亚端粒重复。
检测到5/49例致病染色体失衡(如果不将6号染色体亚端粒缺失视为致病因素,则为4/49例)表明,当标准染色体分析正常时,应进行全基因组筛查,并证实阵列比较基因组杂交将对产前和产后诊断产生重大影响,同时为更准确的遗传咨询提供信息。