Wilson W R, Ilbawi M N, DeLeon S Y, Quinones J A, Arcilla R A, Sulayman R F, Idriss F S
Heart Institute for Children, Christ Hospital and Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Ill. 60453.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 May;103(5):861-70; discussion 870-1.
To delineate factors that contribute to improved surgical outcome in patients with total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage, we reviewed the records of 52 consecutive patients. Venous drainage was supracardiac in 25 (48%), cardiac in 12 (23%), infracardiac in 10 (19%), and mixed in five (10%). Preoperative pulmonary venous obstruction was present in 18 patients (35%). Median age at the time of repair was 35 days and weight, 3.7 kg. Repair was performed with deep hypothermia, low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass, and occasional short periods of circulatory arrest. In patients with coronary sinus drainage, the veins were tunneled to the left atrium through an enlarged atrial septal defect, with a mortality of 8% (1/12) and no postoperative stenosis. The approach in patients with supracardiac, infracardiac, and mixed drainage varied with time. In 16 patients, the condition was managed by apical or right-sided exposure of the common vein, anastomosis of the common vein to the left atrium with continuous sutures, and primary closure of the atrial septal defect (type I repair). In the other 24 patients the common vein was approached from the right side through the right atrium and the interatrial septum. Common vein-left atrium anastomosis was performed with interrupted sutures and a piece of pericardium used to augment the anastomosis, prevent common vein distortion, and close the atrial septal defect (type II repair). Mortality in type I repair was 25% (4/16) and in type II repair, 4% (1/24). Follow-up was 7.86 +/- 4.0 years with no late deaths. Postoperative stenosis occurred in five of 14 (36%) patients who had type I repair versus two of 23 (9%) who had type II repair. Multivariate analysis showed that type I repair was a positive risk factor for hospital mortality (p = 0.05) and restenosis (p = 0.04). The technique of transatrial exposure of the common venous chamber, interrupted suturing of the common vein to the left atrium, and pericardial patch augmentation significantly improves survival and decreases risk of restenosis.
为了明确有助于改善完全性肺静脉异位引流患者手术效果的因素,我们回顾了52例连续患者的病历。静脉引流为心上型的有25例(48%),心内型的有12例(23%),心下型的有10例(19%),混合型的有5例(10%)。18例患者(35%)术前存在肺静脉梗阻。修复手术时的中位年龄为35天,体重为3.7千克。手术在深低温、低流量体外循环下进行,偶尔有短时间的循环阻断。对于冠状静脉窦引流的患者,将静脉通过扩大的房间隔缺损隧道至左心房,死亡率为8%(1/12),且无术后狭窄。心上型、心下型和混合型引流患者的手术方法随时间而变化。16例患者采用经心尖或右侧暴露共同静脉,用连续缝线将共同静脉与左心房吻合,并直接闭合房间隔缺损(I型修复)。另外24例患者经右侧通过右心房和房间隔暴露共同静脉。用间断缝线进行共同静脉与左心房吻合,并用一片心包片加强吻合、防止共同静脉扭曲并闭合房间隔缺损(II型修复)。I型修复的死亡率为25%(4/16),II型修复的死亡率为4%(1/24)。随访时间为7.86±4.0年,无晚期死亡病例。I型修复的14例患者中有5例(36%)发生术后狭窄,而II型修复的23例患者中有2例(9%)发生术后狭窄。多因素分析显示,I型修复是医院死亡率(p = 0.05)和再狭窄(p = 0.04)的阳性危险因素。经心房暴露共同静脉腔、用间断缝线将共同静脉与左心房缝合以及心包片加强技术可显著提高生存率并降低再狭窄风险。