Teichroeb Julie A, Marteinson Sarah, Sicotte Pascale
Department of Anthropology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Am J Primatol. 2005 Feb;65(2):197-203. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20108.
The ability to recognize individuals is a prerequisite for analyzing social relationships. We marked five adult and subadult Colobus vellerosus (three in 2002, and two in 2003) at the Boabeng Fiema Monkey Sanctuary, Ghana, to assess the feasibility of dye-marking black-and-white colobus, describe their reactions, and compare some of their behaviors with those of unmarked individuals. We used Nyanzol-D, a nontoxic black dye sprayed on the white tail (or white thigh) of the animal with a spray gun or a tree sprayer. Reactions to the marking procedure ranged from moving away and staring at the observer, without interruption in feeding (in one subject), to fleeing about 5 m away (in four subjects). In 234 hr of ad libitum observations (in 2002 and 2003), marks were scratched or otherwise were the object of attention from the bearer or other individuals on only one occasion. In 2002 we collected 22 hr of observations on the three marked monkeys and some unmarked monkeys in 10-min focal samples. Neither the marked nor the unmarked animals attended to the marks during focal samples. Marked and unmarked individuals displayed similar rates of displacement activities (autogrooming, scratching, and yawning). The proportion of scans with at least one near neighbor varied between marked and unmarked subjects, but the direction of the difference was not the same between males and females. The only aggression observed was displacements, and only in one comparison (out of four) did a difference emerge: the marked subadult male received more displacements than the unmarked males. Overall, marked and unmarked individuals did not differ consistently in our measures. Examination of the potential effects of marking should continue, since changes in pelage coloration may have longer-term social effects in species that rely largely on vision.
识别个体的能力是分析社会关系的前提条件。我们在加纳的博阿本菲马猴子保护区对5只成年和亚成年白臀叶猴(2002年3只,2003年2只)进行了标记,以评估对白黑疣猴进行染料标记的可行性,描述它们的反应,并将它们的一些行为与未标记个体的行为进行比较。我们使用了Nyanzol-D,一种无毒黑色染料,用喷枪或树木喷雾器喷在动物的白色尾巴(或白色大腿)上。对标记过程的反应从离开并盯着观察者,进食不受影响(一只个体)到逃到约5米外(四只个体)不等。在2002年和2003年进行的234小时自由观察中,标记被抓挠或以其他方式成为携带者或其他个体关注对象的情况仅出现过一次。2002年,我们在10分钟的焦点样本中对3只标记猴子和一些未标记猴子进行了22小时的观察。在焦点样本期间,标记和未标记的动物都没有注意到标记。标记和未标记个体的替代行为(自我梳理、抓挠和打哈欠)发生率相似。至少有一个近邻的扫描比例在标记和未标记个体之间有所不同,但雄性和雌性之间差异的方向不同。观察到的唯一攻击行为是替代行为,并且仅在四项比较中的一项中出现了差异:标记的亚成年雄性比未标记的雄性受到更多的替代行为。总体而言,在我们的测量中,标记和未标记个体没有持续的差异。由于毛色变化可能对主要依赖视觉的物种产生长期的社会影响,因此应继续研究标记的潜在影响。