Aghdaee S Mehdi, Zandvakili Amin
School of Cognitive Sciences (SCS), Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics (IPM), Niavaran, Bahonar Square, P.O. Box 19395-5746, Tehran, Iran.
Vision Res. 2005 Apr;45(9):1099-105. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.012. Epub 2004 Dec 16.
In this study, we investigated the effect of attention on local motion detectors. For this purpose we used logarithmic spirals previously used by Cavanagh and Favreau [Perception, 1980, 9(2), 175-182]. While the adapting stimulus was a rotating logarithmic spiral, the test stimulus was either the same spiral or its mirror image. When superimposed, all contours of the spiral stimulus and its mirror image are 90 degrees apart. Presenting the same spiral during the test period shows adaptation of both local motion detectors and global rotation detectors, whereas showing the mirror-spiral stimulates another set of local motion detectors, and therefore illustrates adaptation at only the global motion level. To manipulate the attentional state of observers, a secondary task was presented during the adaptation phase and observers either performed the task or ignored it. Motion aftereffect (MAE) duration was measured afterwards. While the effects of attention and test stimulus type on MAE duration were both significant, the difference in the MAE strength between the attention-distracted and attention-not-distracted conditions was equal when the test stimulus was the same-spiral or the mirror-spiral, suggesting that attention to spiral motion modulates only global rotation units and does not affect local motion detectors located at V1. Our results are in accord with those reported by Watanabe et al. [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 1998, 95(19), 11489-11492] which showed differential modulation of motion processing areas depending on the type of motion being attended. Therefore our data are supportive of the notion that attentional modulation of V1 is highly task-dependent.
在本研究中,我们调查了注意力对局部运动探测器的影响。为此,我们使用了先前卡瓦纳和法夫罗[《感知》,1980年,9(2),175 - 182]所使用的对数螺旋线。适应刺激是一个旋转的对数螺旋线,测试刺激则是相同的螺旋线或其镜像。当叠加时,螺旋刺激及其镜像的所有轮廓相隔90度。在测试期间呈现相同的螺旋线会显示局部运动探测器和全局旋转探测器都出现适应,而呈现镜像螺旋线会刺激另一组局部运动探测器,因此仅在全局运动水平上显示适应。为了操纵观察者的注意力状态,在适应阶段呈现了一个次要任务,观察者要么执行该任务,要么忽略它。之后测量运动后效(MAE)的持续时间。虽然注意力和测试刺激类型对MAE持续时间的影响都很显著,但当测试刺激是相同螺旋线或镜像螺旋线时,注意力分散和注意力未分散条件下MAE强度的差异是相等的,这表明对螺旋运动的注意力仅调节全局旋转单元,而不影响位于V1的局部运动探测器。我们的结果与渡边等人[《美国国家科学院院刊》,1998年,95(19),11489 - 11492]所报道的结果一致,他们表明根据所关注的运动类型,运动处理区域存在差异调节。因此,我们的数据支持这样一种观点,即V1的注意力调节高度依赖于任务。