Kobelt G, Lindgren P, Singh A, Klareskog L
European Health Economics SAS, 492 chemin des Laurens, F-06530 Spéracèdes, France.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Aug;64(8):1174-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.032789. Epub 2005 Feb 11.
To estimate the cost effectiveness of combination treatment with etanercept plus methotrexate in comparison with monotherapies in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using a new model that incorporates both functional status and disease activity.
Effectiveness data were based on a 2 year trial in 682 patients with active RA (TEMPO). Data on resource consumption and utility related to function and disease activity were obtained from a survey of 616 patients in Sweden. A Markov model was constructed with five states according to functional status (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)) subdivided into high and low disease activity. The cost for each quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained was estimated by Monte Carlo simulation.
Disease activity had a highly significant effect on utilities, independently of HAQ. For resource consumption, only HAQ was a significant predictor, with the exception of sick leave. Compared with methotrexate alone, etanercept plus methotrexate over 2 years increased total costs by 14,221 euros and led to a QALY gain of 0.38. When treatment was continued for 10 years, incremental costs were 42,148 euros for a QALY gain of 0.91. The cost per QALY gained was 37,331 euros and 46,494 euros, respectively. The probability that the cost effectiveness ratio is below a threshold of 50,000 euros/QALY is 88%.
Incorporating the influence of disease activity into this new model allows better assessment of the effects of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment on patients' general wellbeing. In this analysis, the cost per QALY gained with combination treatment with etanercept plus methotrexate compared with methotrexate alone falls within the acceptable range.
使用一种纳入功能状态和疾病活动度的新模型,评估与单药治疗相比,依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤治疗活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的成本效益。
有效性数据基于一项针对682例活动性RA患者的为期2年的试验(TEMPO)。与功能和疾病活动度相关的资源消耗和效用数据来自对瑞典616例患者的调查。根据功能状态(健康评估问卷(HAQ))构建了一个具有五个状态的马尔可夫模型,再细分为高疾病活动度和低疾病活动度。通过蒙特卡洛模拟估计每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本。
疾病活动度对效用有高度显著影响,与HAQ无关。对于资源消耗,除病假外,只有HAQ是显著预测因素。与单独使用甲氨蝶呤相比,依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤在2年内使总成本增加了14221欧元,并导致QALY增加0.38。当治疗持续10年时,增量成本为42148欧元,QALY增加0.91。每获得一个QALY的成本分别为37331欧元和46494欧元。成本效益比低于50000欧元/QALY阈值的概率为88%。
将疾病活动度的影响纳入该新模型可更好地评估抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗对患者总体健康状况的影响。在本分析中,依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤与单独使用甲氨蝶呤相比,每获得一个QALY的成本在可接受范围内。