Suppr超能文献

使用人组织激肽释放酶2和前列腺特异性抗原联合临床分期及Gleason分级对病理器官局限型临床T1c期前列腺癌预测准确性的比较

Comparison of predictive accuracy for pathologically organ confined clinical stage T1c prostate cancer using human glandular kallikrein 2 and prostate specific antigen combined with clinical stage and Gleason grade.

作者信息

Haese Alexander, Vaisanen Ville, Lilja Hans, Kattan Michael W, Rittenhouse Harry G, Pettersson Kim, Chan Daniel W, Huland Hartwig, Sokoll Lori J, Partin Alan W

机构信息

Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):752-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152618.38747.dd.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Previously human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) has been implicated to predict pathologically organ confined prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with stage T2 disease. Now we evaluated the usefulness of hK2, as measured by 2 entirely different immunoassay designs, to enhance the discrimination of pathologically organ from nonorgan confined clinical stage T1c PCa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of pretreatment serum from 148 men with clinical stage T1c PCa was used in 2 equally sensitive and specific methods to measure total hK2 with independent reagents and entirely different assay designs. Total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) were measured and percent fPSA was calculated. We determined the algorithm, hK2*tPSA/fPSA, from data generated by each hK2 assay, calculated means, medians and ranges for each analyte and algorithm, and calculated the significance of differences on univariate analysis. Using pretreatment PSA, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason grade we then developed a multivariate logistic regression base model to predict organ confined cancer and we compared predictions of the base model supplemented by the different hK2 measurements.

RESULTS

hK2 and hK2 based algorithms obtained by each hK2 assay were significantly different for pT2a/b vs pT3a or greater PCa (p = 0.034 to 0.0001) compared to tPSA (p = 0.06), fPSA (p = 0.90) or percent fPSA (p = 0.059). However, AUC (0.67 to 0.70) calculated by ROC analysis of the 4 models containing hK2 derived information was not significantly larger than that of the base model (AUC = 0.64, p = 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

The current data confirm that hK2 alone or hK2*tPSA/fPSA measured by 2 immunoassays is significantly lower in men with pT2a/b vs pT3a or greater PCa compared to tPSA, fPSA or percent fPSA on univariate analysis of a validation set of clinical stage T1c prostate cancer treated at an American center of excellence for prostate cancer surgery. However, the incorporation of preoperative hK2 into multiparameter predictive models for pT2 cancers did not increase predictive accuracy in this cohort of men.

摘要

目的

此前有研究表明,人腺体激肽释放酶2(hK2)可用于预测T2期患者病理上局限于器官的前列腺癌(PCa)。现在,我们评估了通过两种完全不同的免疫分析设计测量的hK2,在增强对临床T1c期PCa患者病理上器官局限与非器官局限的鉴别能力方面的作用。

材料与方法

对148例临床T1c期PCa男性患者的系列预处理血清样本,采用两种同样灵敏且特异的方法,使用独立试剂及完全不同的分析设计来检测总hK2。检测总前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA)和游离PSA(fPSA),并计算fPSA百分比。我们根据每个hK2检测所生成的数据确定了hK2*tPSA/fPSA算法,计算了每种分析物和算法的均值、中位数及范围,并计算了单因素分析中差异的显著性。利用预处理时的PSA、临床分期和活检Gleason分级,我们建立了一个多因素逻辑回归基础模型来预测器官局限癌,并比较了补充不同hK2测量值后的基础模型的预测结果。

结果

与tPSA(p = 0.06)、fPSA(p = 0.90)或fPSA百分比(p = 0.059)相比,每种hK2检测所获得的hK2及基于hK2的算法在区分pT2a/b期与pT3a期或更晚期PCa时差异显著(p = 0.034至0.0001)。然而,对包含hK2衍生信息的4个模型进行ROC分析计算得到的AUC(0.67至0.70),并不显著大于基础模型的AUC(0.64,p = 0.52)。

结论

目前的数据证实,在美国一家前列腺癌手术卓越中心接受治疗的临床T1c期前列腺癌验证组中,单因素分析显示,与tPSA、fPSA或fPSA百分比相比,pT2a/b期与pT3a期或更晚期PCa男性患者单独的hK2或通过两种免疫分析测量的hK2*tPSA/fPSA显著更低。然而,将术前hK2纳入pT2期癌症的多参数预测模型中,并未提高该队列男性患者的预测准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验