Suppr超能文献

2002年巴尔的摩-华盛顿特区都会区症状监测的门诊就诊与护士咨询热线数据比较

Comparison of office visit and nurse advice hotline data for syndromic surveillance--Baltimore-Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, 2002.

作者信息

Henry Jade Vu, Magruder S, Snyder M

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente of the Mid-Atlantic States, 2102 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, MD 20849, USA.

出版信息

MMWR Suppl. 2004 Sep 24;53:112-6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Kaiser Permanente of the Mid-Atlantic States (KPMAS) is collaborating with the Electronic Surveillance System for Early Notification of Community-Based Epidemics II (ESSENCE II) program to understand how managed-care data can be effectively used for syndromic surveillance.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined whether KPMAS nurse advice hotline data would be able to predict the syndrome diagnoses made during subsequent KPMAS office visits.

METHODS

All nurse advice hotline calls during 2002 that were linked to an outpatient office visit were identified. By using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, outpatient visits were categorized into seven ESSENCE II syndrome groups (coma, gastrointestinal, respiratory, neurologic, hemorrhagic, infectious dermatologic, and fever). Nurse advice hotline calls were categorized into ESSENCE II syndrome groups on the basis of the advice guidelines assigned. For each syndrome group, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of hotline calls were calculated by using office visits as a diagnostic standard. For matching syndrome call-visit pairs, the lag (i.e., the number of hours that elapsed between the date and time the patient spoke to an advice nurse and the date and time the patient made an office visit) was calculated.

RESULTS

Of all syndrome groups, the sensitivity of hotline calls for respiratory syndrome was highest (74.7%), followed by hotline calls for gastrointestinal syndrome (72.0%). The specificity of all nurse advice syndrome groups ranged from 88.9% to 99.9%. The mean lag between hotline calls and office visits ranged from 8.3 to 50 hours, depending on the syndrome group.

CONCLUSIONS

The timeliness of hotline data capture compared with office visit data capture, as well as the sensitivity and specificity of hotline calls for detecting respiratory and gastrointestinal syndromes, indicate that KPMAS nurse advice hotline data can be used to predict KPMAS syndromic outpatient office visits.

摘要

引言

大西洋中部各州的凯撒医疗集团(KPMAS)正在与基于社区疫情早期预警的电子监测系统二期(ESSENCE II)项目合作,以了解管理式医疗数据如何能有效地用于症状监测。

目的

本研究调查了KPMAS护士咨询热线数据是否能够预测随后KPMAS门诊就诊时做出的综合征诊断。

方法

确定了2002年期间所有与门诊就诊相关的护士咨询热线电话。通过使用国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)编码,门诊就诊被分为七个ESSENCE II综合征组(昏迷、胃肠道、呼吸道、神经、出血、感染性皮肤病和发热)。护士咨询热线电话根据所分配的咨询指南被分为ESSENCE II综合征组。对于每个综合征组,以门诊就诊作为诊断标准,计算热线电话的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值。对于匹配的综合征呼叫-就诊对,计算滞后时间(即患者与咨询护士通话的日期和时间与患者进行门诊就诊的日期和时间之间经过的小时数)。

结果

在所有综合征组中,热线电话对呼吸道综合征的敏感性最高(74.7%),其次是对胃肠道综合征的热线电话(72.0%)。所有护士咨询综合征组的特异性范围为88.9%至99.9%。热线电话与门诊就诊之间的平均滞后时间根据综合征组的不同,在8.3至50小时之间。

结论

与门诊就诊数据采集相比,热线数据采集的及时性,以及热线电话对检测呼吸道和胃肠道综合征的敏感性和特异性,表明KPMAS护士咨询热线数据可用于预测KPMAS症状性门诊就诊。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验