Tolias Christos M, Bullock M Ross
Division of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0631, USA.
NeuroRx. 2004 Jan;1(1):71-9. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.1.1.71.
To date, despite very encouraging preclinical results, almost all phase II/III clinical neuroprotection trials in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have failed to show any consistent improvement in outcome for TBI patients. To understand the reasons behind such developments we need to review and evaluate the evolution of trial design as a result of our changing understanding of the pathophysiology of brain cell death and progress of translational research from the laboratory bench to the bedside. This paper attempts to critically appraise these neuroprotection trials, rationalize the paucity of effectiveness, review any recent developments in the field, and try to draw some conclusions on how to move forward.
迄今为止,尽管临床前结果非常令人鼓舞,但几乎所有针对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的II/III期临床神经保护试验都未能显示TBI患者的预后有任何持续改善。为了理解这些进展背后的原因,我们需要回顾和评估试验设计的演变,这是由于我们对脑细胞死亡病理生理学的理解不断变化,以及转化研究从实验室工作台到床边的进展。本文试图批判性地评估这些神经保护试验,解释疗效不佳的原因,回顾该领域的任何最新进展,并尝试就如何推进得出一些结论。