Kostopanagiotou Georgia, Markantonis Sophia L, Polydorou Maria, Pandazi Ageliki, Kottis George
Second Department of Anesthesiology, Attikon Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
J Clin Anesth. 2005 Feb;17(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.03.008.
To compare recovery and restoration of cognitive function after fentanyl-propofol or remifentanil-propofol anesthesia administration in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
Randomized, double-blind, prospective study.
Department of Anesthesiology, University hospital.
Seventy patients with ASA physical statuses II and III (53 men and 17 women) undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy.
Anesthetic technique and drugs were identical in the 2 groups, with the exception of remifentanil and fentanyl administration. Induction of anesthesia was obtained with a bolus dose of propofol (1-2 mg/kg), maintenance was achieved with a propofol infusion according to hemodynamics and nitrous oxide/oxygen (FIO(2), 0.50). Muscle relaxation was achieved with rocuronium. The remifentanil group received 1 microg/kg of remifentanil as a single dose during the induction of anesthesia and 0.5 microg/kg per minute as an infusion throughout the procedure. The fentanyl group received 2 microg/kg of fentanyl as a single dose during the induction of anesthesia.
Intraoperative hemodynamic adverse events were recorded. All patients were also evaluated with regard to their recovery and the restoration of their cognitive function, recording the immediate recovery times and using the Aldrete score 15 and 60 minutes after surgery and the Hasegawa scale 6 hours after surgery. For evaluation of postoperative pain, the Numeric Pain Scale (0-10) was used.
Patients receiving remifentanil had significantly (P < .05) fewer episodes of intraoperative hypertension and needed nitroglycerine administration less frequently (P < .05) than those receiving fentanyl. Immediate recovery was significantly earlier (P < .05) with remifentanil (eye opening, 5.1 +/- 1.3 [remifentanil] and 7.2 +/- 3.7 [fentanyl] minutes; extubation time, 5.4 +/- 1.9 [remifentanil] and 7.8 +/- 4.1 [fentanyl] minutes). The Hasegawa Dementia Scale scores 6 hours after surgery and Aldrete scores 15 and 60 minutes after surgery did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Pain levels were also similar for patients taking remifentanil and fentanyl.
Although intraoperative hemodynamics were better preserved and immediate recovery was more rapid with remifentanil, overall postoperative recovery and restoration of cognitive functions as well as postoperative pain intensity seem to be similar for patients receiving remifentanil and for those receiving fentanyl combined with propofol for carotid endarterectomy operations.
比较接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者在使用芬太尼-丙泊酚或瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚麻醉后认知功能的恢复情况。
随机、双盲、前瞻性研究。
大学医院麻醉科。
70例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级的患者(53例男性和17例女性),接受择期颈动脉内膜切除术。
两组的麻醉技术和药物相同,除了瑞芬太尼和芬太尼的使用。麻醉诱导采用单次静脉注射丙泊酚(1-2mg/kg),根据血流动力学情况及氧化亚氮/氧气(FIO₂,0.50)通过丙泊酚输注维持麻醉。使用罗库溴铵实现肌肉松弛。瑞芬太尼组在麻醉诱导期间接受单次剂量1μg/kg的瑞芬太尼,并在整个手术过程中以每分钟0.5μg/kg的速度输注。芬太尼组在麻醉诱导期间接受单次剂量2μg/kg的芬太尼。
记录术中血流动力学不良事件。所有患者还就其恢复情况和认知功能恢复进行评估,记录即时恢复时间,并在术后15分钟和60分钟使用Aldrete评分,术后6小时使用长谷川量表。为评估术后疼痛,使用数字疼痛量表(0-10)。
接受瑞芬太尼的患者术中高血压发作次数显著少于接受芬太尼的患者(P<.05),且硝酸甘油的使用频率也较低(P<.05)。瑞芬太尼组的即时恢复明显更早(P<.05)(睁眼时间,瑞芬太尼组为5.1±1.