Kneller James, Kalifa Jérôme, Zou Renqiang, Zaitsev Alexey V, Warren Mark, Berenfeld Omer, Vigmond Edward J, Leon L Joshua, Nattel Stanley, Jalife José
Research Center and Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Circ Res. 2005 Mar 18;96(5):e35-47. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000160709.49633.2b.
The mechanisms by which Na+-channel blocking antiarrhythmic drugs terminate atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. Classical "leading-circle" theory suggests that Na+-channel blockade should, if anything, promote re-entry. We used an ionically-based mathematical model of vagotonic AF to evaluate the effects of applying pure Na+-current (I(Na)) inhibition during sustained arrhythmia. Under control conditions, AF was maintained by 1 or 2 dominant spiral waves, with fibrillatory propagation at critical levels of action potential duration (APD) dispersion. I(Na) inhibition terminated AF increasingly with increasing block, terminating all AF at 65% block. During 1:1 conduction, I(Na) inhibition reduced APD (by 13% at 4 Hz and 60% block), conduction velocity (by 37%), and re-entry wavelength (by 24%). During AF, I(Na) inhibition increased the size of primary rotors and reduced re-entry rate (eg, dominant frequency decreased by 33% at 60% I(Na) inhibition) while decreasing generation of secondary wavelets by wavebreak. Three mechanisms contributed to I(Na) block-induced AF termination in the model: (1) enlargement of the center of rotation beyond the capacity of the computational substrate; (2) decreased anchoring to functional obstacles, increasing meander and extinction at boundaries; and (3) reduction in the number of secondary wavelets that could provide new primary rotors. Optical mapping in isolated sheep hearts confirmed that tetrodotoxin dose-dependently terminates AF while producing effects qualitatively like those of I(Na) inhibition in the mathematical model. We conclude that pure INa inhibition terminates AF, producing activation changes consistent with previous clinical and experimental observations. These results provide insights into previously enigmatic mechanisms of class I antiarrhythmic drug-induced AF termination. The full text of this article is available online at http://circres.ahajournals.org
钠通道阻滞类抗心律失常药物终止心房颤动(AF)的机制尚不清楚。经典的“主导环”理论认为,钠通道阻滞反而应该促进折返。我们使用了一个基于离子的迷走神经介导的房颤数学模型,来评估在持续性心律失常期间应用纯钠电流(I(Na))抑制的效果。在对照条件下,房颤由1个或2个主导螺旋波维持,在动作电位时程(APD)离散的临界水平下进行颤动性传播。I(Na)抑制随着阻滞程度的增加越来越多地终止房颤,在65%阻滞时终止所有房颤。在1:1传导期间,I(Na)抑制降低了APD(在4 Hz和60%阻滞时降低13%)、传导速度(降低37%)和折返波长(降低24%)。在房颤期间,I(Na)抑制增加了初级转子的大小并降低了折返率(例如,在60% I(Na)抑制时主导频率降低33%),同时减少了由波裂产生的次级小波。在该模型中,三种机制促成了I(Na)阻滞诱导的房颤终止:(1)旋转中心扩大到超出计算基质的能力;(2)对功能性障碍物的锚定减少,增加了在边界处的曲折和消失;(3)能够提供新的初级转子的次级小波数量减少。在离体绵羊心脏中的光学标测证实,河豚毒素剂量依赖性地终止房颤,同时产生与数学模型中I(Na)抑制定性相似的效应。我们得出结论,纯I(Na)抑制可终止房颤,产生与先前临床和实验观察一致的激活变化。这些结果为I类抗心律失常药物诱导的房颤终止的先前神秘机制提供了见解。本文全文可在http://circres.ahajournals.org在线获取