Department of Economics, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2004;3(3):133-41. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200403030-00004.
If a healthcare delivery system is to achieve quality and efficiency, participants must be able to measure quality and efficiency. Yet no healthcare system in the world - and certainly not the current US system, our main focus - measures, reports and acts on such a measure of productivity. This article describes the conventional methodology for measuring healthcare productivity and the more recent focus on episodes of illness and priority conditions. Specific clinical examples of productivity improvement and the many uses of such research - for private industry as well as public policy - illustrate why productivity research could be considered the 'genome' of healthcare delivery innovation.
如果医疗服务提供系统想要实现质量和效率,那么参与者必须能够衡量质量和效率。然而,世界上没有任何医疗体系——当然也包括我们的主要关注点,即当前的美国医疗体系——能够衡量、报告和针对这种生产力指标采取行动。本文介绍了衡量医疗保健生产力的传统方法,以及最近对疾病发作和优先情况的关注。具体的临床生产力改进示例以及此类研究的许多用途——无论是对私营行业还是公共政策——都说明了为什么生产力研究可以被视为医疗服务创新的“基因组”。