Centre for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement, BC Research Institute for Children's and Women's Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2004;3(3):143-51. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200403030-00005.
Decision makers within the Calgary Health Region adopted and applied programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) for priority-setting activity across major service portfolios within the Region.
Seventeen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with senior managers and clinicians to gain a user perspective and identify specific areas for process refinement. Data were thematically coded and categorised into relevant themes.
Key strengths included a culture shift in thinking about the need to reallocate resources within a fixed funding envelope, whereas a key challenge identified was in putting forth genuine disinvestment options. Areas suggested for improvement included evoking an incentive system for stakeholder engagement and having a mechanism for tracking the effect of resource reallocations.
Both an evidence-based approach to priority setting, as well as a way of thinking around managing resource scarcity, can be integrated into organisational processes. Findings reported in this article will influence further application in Calgary and should provide insight for those attempting such activity elsewhere.
卡尔加里卫生局的决策者在该地区的主要服务项目组合中采用并应用了项目预算编制和边际分析(PBMA)来进行优先事项的设定。
对 17 名高级管理人员和临床医生进行了 17 次深入的定性访谈,以获得用户的观点并确定流程改进的具体领域。对数据进行了主题编码,并分为相关主题。
主要优势包括在固定资金范围内重新分配资源的思维方式发生了转变,而确定的一个主要挑战是提出真正的撤资方案。建议改进的领域包括激发利益相关者参与的激励机制和建立跟踪资源重新分配效果的机制。
基于证据的优先事项设定方法以及管理资源短缺的思维方式都可以纳入组织流程。本文报告的研究结果将影响卡尔加里地区的进一步应用,并为其他地区开展此类活动提供参考。